PSCC vs. CAG
PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples, while CAG (Conagra Brands, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PSCC returned 6.74%/yr vs -5.58%/yr for CAG. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PSCC vs. CAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCC achieves a 17.89% return, which is significantly higher than CAG's -13.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCC has outperformed CAG with an annualized return of 6.74%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively lower -5.58% annualized return.
PSCC
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- 1.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.16%
- 10Y*
- 6.74%
CAG
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- 6M
- -10.24%
- YTD
- -13.45%
- 1Y
- -19.74%
- 3Y*
- -19.47%
- 5Y*
- -11.42%
- 10Y*
- -5.58%
PSCC vs. CAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 17.89% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | -13.45% | -33.32% | 1.46% | -22.82% | 17.52% | -2.55% | 8.69% | 65.50% | -41.99% | -2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCC and CAG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.44 |
The correlation between PSCC and CAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (10 years) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCC vs. CAG — Risk / Return Rank
PSCC
CAG
PSCC vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCC | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.91 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | -0.56 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.72 | -1.14 | +1.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCC vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCC drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum CAG drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCC and CAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCC | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -62.52% | +28.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -35.58% | +20.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.36% | -56.66% | +33.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.36% | -62.52% | +39.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | -62.52% | +28.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -57.31% | +49.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -15.84% | +9.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.69% | 17.27% | -8.58% |
Volatility
PSCC vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is 6.12%, while Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that PSCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCC | CAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 12.70% | -6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.96% | 24.29% | -12.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 29.74% | -12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 23.85% | -5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 26.48% | -7.13% |
Dividends
PSCC vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison
PSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than CAG's 9.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAG Conagra Brands, Inc. | 9.77% | 8.09% | 5.05% | 4.75% | 3.32% | 3.44% | 2.52% | 2.48% | 3.98% | 2.19% | 29.36% | 2.37% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.66% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCC and CAG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAG has higher volatility (12.70%) compared to PSCC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCC dropped -33.61% vs CAG's -62.52%.
PSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCC and CAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer