PR vs. CLS
PR (Permian Resources Corporation) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. PR operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 3 years, PR returned 28.61%/yr vs 191.08%/yr for CLS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PR vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PR achieves a 39.03% return, which is significantly higher than CLS's 18.81% return.
PR
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- 39.03%
- 6M
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- 41.44%
- 3Y*
- 28.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLS
- 1D
- -6.80%
- 1M
- -4.40%
- YTD
- 18.81%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 157.59%
- 3Y*
- 191.08%
- 5Y*
- 113.59%
- 10Y*
- 43.13%
PR vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR Permian Resources Corporation | 39.03% | 1.89% | 11.66% | 49.42% | 16.87% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 18.81% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 9.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PR and CLS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2022 | 0.25 |
The correlation between PR and CLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PR:
$15.88B
CLS:
$40.63B
PR:
$0.85
CLS:
$8.28
PR:
22.56
CLS:
42.39
PR:
0.37
CLS:
0.57
PR:
3.97
CLS:
2.95
PR:
1.40
CLS:
19.37
PR:
$3.69B
CLS:
$13.81B
PR:
$1.20B
CLS:
$1.60B
PR:
$3.15B
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PR vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
PR
CLS
PR vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PR | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.32 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 5.42 | -3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.68 | 12.78 | -7.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PR vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PR drawdown since its inception was -39.39%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PR | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.39% | -96.93% | +57.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -29.24% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.39% | -53.96% | +14.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.10% | -25.66% | +11.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.52% | -73.27% | +60.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.33% | 12.38% | -5.05% |
Volatility
PR vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is 10.16%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 27.86%. This indicates that PR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PR | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.16% | 27.86% | -17.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.63% | 54.05% | -30.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.75% | 73.04% | -39.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.23% | 57.84% | -15.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.23% | 50.05% | -7.82% |
Dividends
PR vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
PR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PR Permian Resources Corporation | 3.23% | 4.28% | 5.91% | 2.72% | 0.53% |
Financials
PR vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Permian Resources Corporation and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PR and CLS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.86%) compared to PR (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PR dropped -39.39% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PR and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer