PR vs. C

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PR (Permian Resources Corporation) and C (Citigroup Inc.) are both stocks. PR operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while C operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, PR returned 28.21%/yr vs 51.72%/yr for C. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PR vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR achieves a 37.73% return, which is significantly higher than C's 26.08% return.

PR

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: -6.25%
• YTD: 37.73%
• 6M: 37.24%
• 1Y: 34.12%
• 3Y*: 28.21%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

C

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: 16.45%
• YTD: 26.08%
• 6M: 24.58%
• 1Y: 89.89%
• 3Y*: 51.72%
• 5Y*: 19.98%
• 10Y*: 17.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PR Permian Resources Corporation	37.73%	1.89%	11.66%	49.42%	16.87%
C Citigroup Inc.	26.08%	70.38%	41.93%	18.98%	-6.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PR and C is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2022	0.27

The correlation between PR and C shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap PR : $15.73B C : $258.71B
EPS PR : $0.85 C : $8.65
PE Ratio PR : 22.35 C : 16.84
PS Ratio PR : 3.94 C : 1.57
PB Ratio PR : 1.39 C : 1.35
Total Revenue (TTM) PR : $3.69B C : $171.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) PR : $1.20B C : $77.85B
EBITDA (TTM) PR : $3.15B C : $24.12B

Return for Risk

PR vs. C — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR

PR Risk / Return Rank: 71
PR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
PR Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PR Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PR Martin Ratio Rank: 75

C

C Risk / Return Rank: 95
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
C Omega Ratio Rank: 93
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
C Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PR	C	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.02	3.20	-2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	3.81	-2.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.49	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	6.12	-4.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.70	17.64	-12.94

PR vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the C Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR and C, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PR vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR drawdown since its inception was -39.39%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR and C.

Drawdown Indicators

	PR	C	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.39%	-98.00%	+58.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.46%	-14.76%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.39%	-31.31%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-44.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.91%	-61.12%	+46.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.52%	-43.52%	+31.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.97%	5.11%	+2.86%

Volatility

PR vs. C - Volatility Comparison

Permian Resources Corporation (PR) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Citigroup Inc. (C) at 6.91%. This indicates that PR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PR	C	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.26%	6.91%	+3.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.04%	23.13%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.81%	28.27%	+5.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.25%	29.12%	+13.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.25%	33.22%	+9.03%

Dividends

PR vs. C - Dividend Comparison

PR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than C's 1.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
C Citigroup Inc.	1.65%	1.99%	3.10%	4.04%	4.51%	3.38%	3.31%	2.40%	2.96%	1.29%	0.71%	0.31%
PR Permian Resources Corporation	3.26%	4.28%	5.91%	2.72%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PR and C in my portfolio?

PR and C have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PR or C?

PR has higher volatility (10.26%) compared to C (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PR dropped -39.39% vs C's -98.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.