PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PR vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PR vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PR achieves a 39.03% return, which is significantly higher than META's -14.67% return.


PR

1D
0.95%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
39.03%
6M
38.93%
1Y
41.44%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
10Y*

META

1D
-0.29%
1M
-7.79%
YTD
-14.67%
6M
-15.30%
1Y
-19.25%
3Y*
25.24%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
17.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PR vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PR
Permian Resources Corporation
39.03%1.89%11.66%49.42%16.87%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-14.67%13.09%66.05%194.13%-26.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PR and META is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2022

0.09

The correlation between PR and META shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PR:

$15.88B

META:

$1.44T

EPS

PR:

$0.85

META:

$27.47

PE Ratio

PR:

22.56

META:

20.47

PEG Ratio

PR:

0.37

META:

0.84

PS Ratio

PR:

3.97

META:

6.72

PB Ratio

PR:

1.40

META:

5.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

PR:

$3.69B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PR:

$1.20B

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

PR:

$3.15B

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PR vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PR
PR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PR vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.93

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

-0.58

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.68

-1.16

+6.84

PR vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PR Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PR and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PR vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PR drawdown since its inception was -39.39%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PR and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.39%

-76.74%

+37.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.46%

-33.30%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.39%

-34.15%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.10%

-28.60%

+14.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.52%

-15.84%

+3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.33%

16.58%

-9.25%

Volatility

PR vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is 10.16%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that PR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.16%

12.90%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.63%

27.85%

-4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.75%

36.18%

-2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.23%

44.18%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.23%

38.76%

+3.47%

Dividends

PR vs. META - Dividend Comparison

PR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than META's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.38%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%
PR
Permian Resources Corporation
3.23%4.28%5.91%2.72%0.53%

Financials

PR vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Permian Resources Corporation and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B202220232024202520260
56.31B
(PR) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PR and META have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to PR (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PR dropped -39.39% vs META's -76.74%.

PR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PR and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer