PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLUG vs. ET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PLUG vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLUG achieves a 40.10% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PLUG has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 4.78%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.


PLUG

1D
-2.47%
1M
-26.98%
YTD
40.10%
6M
18.97%
1Y
113.95%
3Y*
-36.75%
5Y*
-38.69%
10Y*
4.78%

ET

1D
1.65%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
19.85%
6M
19.34%
1Y
12.14%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
20.15%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLUG vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.
40.10%-7.51%-52.67%-63.62%-56.18%-16.75%973.10%154.84%-47.46%96.67%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
19.85%-9.37%53.87%27.87%55.74%42.96%-44.92%5.88%-17.74%-4.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PLUG and ET is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006

0.20

The correlation between PLUG and ET shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PLUG:

$3.84B

ET:

$65.93B

EPS

PLUG:

-$1.39

ET:

$1.36

PS Ratio

PLUG:

4.51

ET:

0.76

PB Ratio

PLUG:

5.12

ET:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

PLUG:

$739.76M

ET:

$89.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PLUG:

-$189.79M

ET:

$20.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

PLUG:

-$745.89M

ET:

$13.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLUG vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLUG
PLUG Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PLUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLUG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PLUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLUG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
ET Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLUG vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLUGETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.22

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

2.70

+0.68

PLUG vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLUG and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLUG vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLUG drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLUG and ET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLUGETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-87.81%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.66%

-9.38%

-47.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.69%

-24.56%

-70.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.43%

-25.82%

-72.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.04%

-72.82%

-26.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.82%

-6.47%

-93.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-25.72%

-70.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.39%

4.65%

+28.74%

Volatility

PLUG vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) has a higher volatility of 26.34% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.08%. This indicates that PLUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLUGETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.34%

5.08%

+21.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.10%

12.03%

+52.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

108.06%

16.13%

+91.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.54%

24.86%

+69.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.47%

34.99%

+54.48%

Dividends

PLUG vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

PLUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.00%7.97%6.51%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%
PLUG
Plug Power Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PLUG vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plug Power Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
163.51M
27.77B
(PLUG) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PLUG and ET have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLUG has higher volatility (26.34%) compared to ET (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLUG dropped -99.99% vs ET's -87.81%.

PLUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLUG and ET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer