PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PKB vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PKB vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 15.78%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.77% annualized return.


PKB

1D
1.14%
1M
0.71%
YTD
14.33%
6M
10.23%
1Y
37.69%
3Y*
27.82%
5Y*
16.59%
10Y*
15.78%

VO

1D
0.97%
1M
2.97%
YTD
10.43%
6M
9.31%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
11.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PKB vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
14.33%22.47%20.24%55.29%-24.88%32.96%24.49%40.15%-31.11%24.67%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.43%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PKB and VO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2005

0.85

The correlation between PKB and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PKB vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PKB
VO

Industrials

41.7%
17.9%

Basic Materials

36.5%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

19.4%
8.6%

Utilities

3.0%
8.3%

Energy

2.4%
8.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
12.8%

Communication Services

-

3.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.8%

Healthcare

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

5.4%

Technology

-

18.6%

Industrials

PKB
41.7%
VO
17.9%

Basic Materials

PKB
36.5%
VO
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PKB
19.4%
VO
8.6%

Utilities

PKB
3.0%
VO
8.3%

Energy

PKB
2.4%
VO
8.5%

Financial Services

PKB
0.1%
VO
12.8%

Communication Services

PKB

-

VO
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

PKB

-

VO
4.8%

Healthcare

PKB

-

VO
7.6%

Real Estate

PKB

-

VO
5.4%

Technology

PKB

-

VO
18.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PKB vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PKB
PKB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PKB vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PKBVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.23

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

8.44

-1.23

PKB vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PKB Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PKB and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PKB vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than VO's maximum drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PKBVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.21%

-58.87%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.41%

-8.17%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.75%

-19.02%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-27.57%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.29%

-39.37%

-12.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.31%

-0.45%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.75%

-7.85%

-7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

2.16%

+2.70%

Volatility

PKB vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.31%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PKBVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.73%

4.31%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.69%

9.71%

+8.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.78%

12.74%

+11.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.78%

17.65%

+8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.29%

18.96%

+8.33%

PKB vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PKB vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than VO's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
0.14%0.14%0.23%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.30%0.37%0.54%0.17%0.31%0.11%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


PKB and VO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKB has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs VO's -58.87%.

On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.78% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.

VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.

PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.03% for VO.

PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PKB and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer