PKB vs. VO
PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PKB returned 15.78%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PKB charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
PKB vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PKB achieves a 14.33% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PKB has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 15.78%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.77% annualized return.
PKB
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- 27.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
PKB vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 14.33% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -31.11% | 24.67% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between PKB and VO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2005 | 0.85 |
The correlation between PKB and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
PKB vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PKB
VO
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Industrials
PKB
VO
Basic Materials
PKB
VO
Consumer Cyclical
PKB
VO
Utilities
PKB
VO
Energy
PKB
VO
Financial Services
PKB
VO
Communication Services
PKB
-
VO
Consumer Defensive
PKB
-
VO
Healthcare
PKB
-
VO
Real Estate
PKB
-
VO
Technology
PKB
-
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PKB vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
PKB
VO
PKB vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PKB | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.23 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.21 | 8.44 | -1.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PKB vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PKB drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, which is greater than VO's maximum drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PKB and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PKB | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -58.87% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -8.17% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.75% | -19.02% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -27.57% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.29% | -39.37% | -12.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.31% | -0.45% | -3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.75% | -7.85% | -7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.86% | 2.16% | +2.70% |
Volatility
PKB vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a higher volatility of 8.73% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.31%. This indicates that PKB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PKB | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.73% | 4.31% | +4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.69% | 9.71% | +8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.78% | 12.74% | +11.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.78% | 17.65% | +8.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 18.96% | +8.33% |
PKB vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PKB has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PKB vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
PKB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PKB and VO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKB has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PKB dropped -65.21% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.78% vs 11.77% for VO. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.78% return vs 11.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.
VO has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.
PKB is categorized as Building & Construction, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PKB and 0.03% for VO.
PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PKB and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer