PFUT vs. XOMO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while XOMO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for XOMO.

Performance

PFUT vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XOMO

• 1D: 3.50%
• 1M: -0.94%
• 6M: 11.69%
• YTD: 13.80%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	2.22%	13.60%	11.50%
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF	13.80%	6.90%	6.11%	-8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and XOMO is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023	0.01

The correlation between PFUT and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XOMO

XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 27
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUT vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFUT	XOMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.85	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.16	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.67	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	XOMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.90%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-12.54%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.47%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.74%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	XOMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.35%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	20.82%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.23%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	19.23%	—

PFUT vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF	35.53%	31.64%	26.94%	5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and XOMO in my portfolio?

PFUT and XOMO have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or XOMO?

On fees, PFUT is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or XOMO?

PFUT is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or XOMO?

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 35.53%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PFUT and XOMO?

PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 1.01% for XOMO.