PFUT vs. FPAS

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and FPAS (FPA Short Duration Government ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while FPAS is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by FPA. Both are actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FPAS.

Performance

PFUT vs. FPAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FPAS

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: -0.57%
• YTD: -0.83%
• 1Y: 2.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. FPAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	2.22%	-0.25%
FPAS FPA Short Duration Government ETF	-0.83%	7.15%	-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and FPAS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024	0.08

The correlation between PFUT and FPAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. FPAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FPAS

FPAS Risk / Return Rank: 21
FPAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FPAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
FPAS Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FPAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FPAS Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUT vs. FPAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and FPA Short Duration Government ETF (FPAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFUT	FPAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.64	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.96	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.84	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	2.14	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	FPAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.47%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.92%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.74%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	FPAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.25%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	4.09%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	4.09%	—

PFUT vs. FPAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FPAS's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. FPAS - Dividend Comparison

PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FPAS FPA Short Duration Government ETF	4.78%	4.75%	0.68%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and FPAS in my portfolio?

PFUT and FPAS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or FPAS?

On fees, FPAS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or FPAS?

FPAS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for PFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or FPAS?

FPAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PFUT and FPAS?

PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while FPAS is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and FPA. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.09% for FPAS.