PFUT vs. PLDR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and PLDR (Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF) are both Sustainable funds from Power Corporation of Canada. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PLDR.

Performance

PFUT vs. PLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLDR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. PLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	2.22%	13.60%	29.98%	-33.60%	0.60%
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	1.69%	12.03%	23.47%	27.47%	-22.52%	11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and PLDR is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.89

The correlation between PFUT and PLDR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFUT vs. PLDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PFUT	PLDR
Industrials	28.7%	8.4%
Technology	20.4%	38.3%
Consumer Cyclical	19.0%	10.1%
Healthcare	13.4%	7.5%
Financial Services	6.9%	9.9%
Utilities	5.5%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	5.3%
Energy	1.2%	3.1%
Basic Materials	1.1%	2.3%
Communication Services	0.5%	11.1%
Real Estate	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. PLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Volatility

PFUT vs. PLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PLDR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. PLDR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PFUT nor PLDR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	0.37%	0.37%	0.38%	0.56%	0.63%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and PLDR in my portfolio?

PFUT and PLDR have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or PLDR?

On fees, PLDR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or PLDR?

PLDR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for PFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or PLDR?

PLDR has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PFUT and PLDR?

Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.59% for PLDR.