PFUT vs. PLDR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR).

PFUT and PLDR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFUT is an actively managed fund by Power Corporation of Canada. It was launched on May 25, 2021. PLDR is an actively managed fund by Power Corporation of Canada. It was launched on May 25, 2021.

Performance

PFUT vs. PLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PFUT vs. PLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	-7.59%	2.22%	13.60%	29.98%	-33.60%	0.62%
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	-9.19%	12.03%	23.47%	27.47%	-22.52%	11.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFUT achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly higher than PLDR's -9.19% return.

PFUT

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: -7.59%
• 6M: -9.75%
• 1Y: 5.81%
• 3Y*: 8.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLDR

• 1D: 2.64%
• 1M: -5.79%
• YTD: -9.19%
• 6M: -5.46%
• 1Y: 10.26%
• 3Y*: 14.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. PLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than PLDR's 0.59% expense ratio.

PFUT

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF

PLDR

Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. PLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUT

PFUT Risk / Return Rank: 19
PFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
PFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
PFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
PFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

PLDR

PLDR Risk / Return Rank: 33
PLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
PLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
PLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUT vs. PLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFUT	PLDR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	0.63	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	0.92	-0.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.14	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	0.83	-0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.11	2.93	-1.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFUT vs. PLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFUT Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the PLDR Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFUT and PLDR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFUT	PLDR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	0.63	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	0.41	-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and PLDR is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PFUT vs. PLDR - Dividend Comparison

PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PLDR Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF	0.41%	0.37%	0.38%	0.56%	0.63%	0.39%

Drawdowns

PFUT vs. PLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFUT drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than PLDR's maximum drawdown of -29.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFUT and PLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	PLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.86%	-29.58%	-15.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	-13.03%	-1.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.58%	-10.51%	-8.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.44%	-8.82%	-12.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.92%	3.69%	+1.23%

Volatility

PFUT vs. PLDR - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) at 5.30%. This indicates that PFUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	PLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	5.30%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.45%	9.58%	+2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.41%	16.31%	+6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.86%	17.16%	+4.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.86%	17.16%	+4.70%