PFUT vs. SUSA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and SUSA (iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while SUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Select Index. PFUT is actively managed, while SUSA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SUSA.

Performance

PFUT vs. SUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SUSA

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 1.88%
• 6M: 9.14%
• YTD: 11.44%
• 1Y: 22.81%
• 3Y*: 18.81%
• 5Y*: 11.12%
• 10Y*: 14.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. SUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	2.22%	13.60%	29.98%	-33.60%	0.60%
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF	11.44%	15.72%	22.43%	23.88%	-21.38%	15.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and SUSA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.89

The correlation between PFUT and SUSA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFUT vs. SUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PFUT	SUSA
Industrials	28.7%	9.3%
Technology	20.4%	40.1%
Consumer Cyclical	19.0%	7.8%
Healthcare	13.4%	9.1%
Financial Services	6.9%	11.8%
Utilities	5.5%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	4.1%
Energy	1.2%	3.3%
Basic Materials	1.1%	2.3%
Communication Services	0.5%	7.3%
Real Estate	-	2.7%

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. SUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SUSA

SUSA Risk / Return Rank: 66
SUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
SUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUT vs. SUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (SUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFUT	SUSA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.77	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.44	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.36	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.02	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	SUSA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-53.93%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.71%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.73%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.22%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	SUSA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.00%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.43%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	18.13%	—

PFUT vs. SUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than SUSA's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. SUSA - Dividend Comparison

PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SUSA iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF	0.84%	0.89%	1.15%	1.32%	1.52%	0.98%	1.17%	1.52%	1.72%	1.40%	1.56%	1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and SUSA in my portfolio?

PFUT and SUSA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or SUSA?

On fees, SUSA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or SUSA?

SUSA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for PFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or SUSA?

SUSA has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PFUT and SUSA?

PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while SUSA is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.25% for SUSA.