PFUT vs. EFFE

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and EFFE (Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while EFFE is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Harbor. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for EFFE.

Performance

PFUT vs. EFFE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFFE

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -2.30%
• 6M: 15.39%
• YTD: 18.30%
• 1Y: 24.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. EFFE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	2.22%	-1.24%
EFFE Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF	18.30%	22.42%	-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and EFFE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.58

The correlation between PFUT and EFFE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. EFFE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EFFE

EFFE Risk / Return Rank: 40
EFFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
EFFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
EFFE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
EFFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
EFFE Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUT vs. EFFE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF (EFFE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFUT	EFFE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.08	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.52	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.21	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.68	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	EFFE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-13.75%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-8.62%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.34%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	EFFE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	22.83%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.37%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.37%	—

PFUT vs. EFFE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than EFFE's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. EFFE - Dividend Comparison

PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EFFE Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF	3.97%	4.69%	0.00%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and EFFE in my portfolio?

PFUT and EFFE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or EFFE?

On fees, PFUT is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or EFFE?

PFUT is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for EFFE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or EFFE?

EFFE has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PFUT and EFFE?

PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while EFFE is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.69% for EFFE.