PFFD vs. CWB
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB).
PFFD and CWB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFFD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. It was launched on Sep 11, 2017. CWB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond. It was launched on Apr 14, 2009. Both PFFD and CWB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PFFD vs. CWB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PFFD vs. CWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | -1.68% | 3.22% | 7.07% | 6.85% | -20.20% | 5.07% | 8.90% | 17.43% | -3.94% | 0.85% |
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 2.86% | 16.61% | 10.06% | 14.49% | -20.81% | 2.18% | 53.39% | 22.39% | -2.00% | 0.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than CWB's 2.86% return.
PFFD
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- —
CWB
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.66%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PFFD vs. CWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than CWB's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PFFD vs. CWB — Risk / Return Rank
PFFD
CWB
PFFD vs. CWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFD | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | 1.50 | -1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 2.07 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.28 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 2.80 | -2.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 9.27 | -8.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFD | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 1.50 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.29 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.84 | -0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFD and CWB is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PFFD vs. CWB - Dividend Comparison
PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than CWB's 1.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 6.52% | 6.37% | 6.42% | 6.49% | 6.63% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.48% | 6.21% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.63% | 1.69% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% |
Drawdowns
PFFD vs. CWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, roughly equal to the maximum CWB drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and CWB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFD | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -32.06% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -7.52% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -28.41% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.42% | -4.16% | -3.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -6.22% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.27% | -0.23% |
Volatility
PFFD vs. CWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) is 2.94%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that PFFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PFFD | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 6.36% | -3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.61% | 11.48% | -5.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.41% | 14.38% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.95% | 12.85% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 14.33% | -1.49% |