CWB vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
CWB and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CWB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond. It was launched on Apr 14, 2009. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both CWB and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CWB or SCHD.
Correlation
The correlation between CWB and SCHD is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CWB vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CWB:
1.42
SCHD:
1.02
CWB:
1.95
SCHD:
1.51
CWB:
1.25
SCHD:
1.18
CWB:
0.63
SCHD:
1.55
CWB:
7.76
SCHD:
5.23
CWB:
1.57%
SCHD:
2.21%
CWB:
8.58%
SCHD:
11.28%
CWB:
-32.06%
SCHD:
-33.37%
CWB:
-7.69%
SCHD:
-7.44%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CWB having a 11.01% return and SCHD slightly lower at 10.68%. Over the past 10 years, CWB has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.08%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 10.89% annualized return.
CWB
11.01%
-0.29%
10.90%
11.49%
9.67%
9.08%
SCHD
10.68%
-5.06%
7.69%
10.91%
10.81%
10.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CWB vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CWB vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CWB vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
CWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than SCHD's 3.67% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.48% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% | 7.36% | 3.66% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.67% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
CWB vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWB drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWB and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CWB vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.62% and 3.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.