CWB vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
CWB and IVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CWB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond. It was launched on Apr 14, 2009. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both CWB and IVV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CWB or IVV.
Key characteristics
| CWB | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.47% | 26.58% |
| 1Y Return | 21.04% | 38.22% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.13% | 9.99% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.53% | 15.91% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.14% | 13.38% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.54 | 3.11 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.62 | 4.15 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.46 | 1.58 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.85 | 4.56 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.80 | 20.64 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.52% | 1.86% |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.24% | 12.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.06% | -55.25% |
| Current Drawdown | -8.15% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CWB and IVV is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
CWB vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CWB achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 26.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CWB has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 9.14%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CWB vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CWB vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CWB vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
CWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than IVV's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.74% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% | 7.36% | 3.66% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.24% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% | 1.83% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
CWB vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWB drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWB and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CWB vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) is 2.21%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that CWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.