PFFD vs. PFFL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL).

PFFD and PFFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PFFD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the ICE BofAML Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index. It was launched on Sep 11, 2017. PFFL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Solactive Preferred Stock ETF Index (+200%). It was launched on Sep 25, 2018. Both PFFD and PFFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

PFFD vs. PFFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PFFD vs. PFFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF	-1.68%	3.22%	7.07%	6.85%	-20.20%	5.07%	8.90%	17.43%	-5.02%
PFFL ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN	-4.36%	2.18%	4.77%	8.65%	-39.15%	7.52%	-15.47%	30.21%	-11.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly higher than PFFL's -4.36% return.

PFFD

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: -3.92%
• YTD: -1.68%
• 6M: -2.29%
• 1Y: 2.93%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: -0.52%
• 10Y*: —

PFFL

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -7.39%
• YTD: -4.36%
• 6M: -7.76%
• 1Y: 0.89%
• 3Y*: 2.13%
• 5Y*: -6.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFD vs. PFFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFL's 0.85% expense ratio.

PFFL

ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN

PFFD

Global X U.S. Preferred ETF

Return for Risk

PFFD vs. PFFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFD

PFFD Risk / Return Rank: 22
PFFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
PFFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
PFFD Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PFFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
PFFD Martin Ratio Rank: 21

PFFL

PFFL Risk / Return Rank: 13
PFFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PFFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PFFL Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PFFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PFFL Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFD vs. PFFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFFD	PFFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	0.05	+0.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	0.20	+0.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.03	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	-0.01	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.20	-0.02	+1.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFFD vs. PFFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the PFFL Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFD and PFFL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFFD	PFFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	0.05	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	-0.26	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	-0.08	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between PFFD and PFFL is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PFFD vs. PFFL - Dividend Comparison

PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than PFFL's 13.68% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF	6.52%	6.37%	6.42%	6.49%	6.63%	5.09%	5.17%	5.48%	6.21%	1.94%
PFFL ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN	13.68%	13.27%	13.76%	13.71%	13.90%	8.82%	9.75%	11.21%	2.02%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PFFD vs. PFFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum PFFL drawdown of -80.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and PFFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFFD	PFFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.93%	-80.68%	+49.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-11.92%	+5.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.45%	-48.51%	+24.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.42%	-41.08%	+33.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-28.32%	+21.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	4.74%	-2.70%

Volatility

PFFD vs. PFFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) is 2.94%, while ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged Preferred Stock Index ETN (PFFL) has a volatility of 6.74%. This indicates that PFFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFFD	PFFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	6.74%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.61%	12.28%	-6.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.41%	19.42%	-11.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.95%	23.54%	-12.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.84%	55.95%	-43.11%