PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFD vs. HYLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFD vs. HYLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than HYLB's 1.76% return.


PFFD

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.32%
6M
-1.56%
YTD
1.09%
1Y
3.11%
3Y*
4.85%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.43%

HYLB

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.27%
6M
1.16%
YTD
1.76%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.71M$36.91M$41.99M
$13.88M$14.42M$12.01M

PFFD vs. HYLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
1.09%3.22%7.07%6.85%-20.20%5.07%8.90%17.43%-3.94%0.69%
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.76%8.74%8.14%12.03%-10.80%3.94%5.04%14.06%-1.80%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFD and HYLB is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017

0.61

The correlation between PFFD and HYLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFD vs. HYLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PFFD
PFFD Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PFFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFD Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

HYLB
HYLB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HYLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLB Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PFFD vs. HYLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PFFDHYLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.28

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

2.33

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.39

9.81

-8.43

PFFD vs. HYLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFD Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the HYLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFD and HYLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PFFD vs. HYLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, which is greater than HYLB's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and HYLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFDHYLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-22.91%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-2.27%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.84%

-4.51%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.45%

-15.54%

-8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.81%

-0.41%

-4.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.55%

-2.40%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

0.54%

+1.63%

Volatility

PFFD vs. HYLB - Volatility Comparison

Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYLB) at 0.79%. This indicates that PFFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFDHYLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

0.79%

+1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.69%

3.08%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

3.75%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.05%

7.47%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

8.12%

+4.56%

PFFD vs. HYLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than HYLB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PFFD vs. HYLB - Dividend Comparison

PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, which matches HYLB's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYLB
Xtrackers USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.97%6.29%6.31%5.84%5.53%4.45%5.22%5.71%5.95%5.85%0.27%
PFFD
Global X U.S. Preferred ETF
5.94%6.37%6.42%6.49%6.63%5.09%5.17%5.48%6.21%1.94%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFD and HYLB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFFD has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to HYLB (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFD dropped -30.93% vs HYLB's -22.91%.

On 5-year performance, HYLB leads with 3.86% vs -0.75% for PFFD. On fees, HYLB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYLB has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYLB has performed better with a 3.86% return vs -0.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYLB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for PFFD.

HYLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 5.94% for PFFD.

PFFD is categorized as Preferred Stock, while HYLB is High Yield Bonds. PFFD tracks ICE BofA Diversified Core U.S. Preferred Securities Index, while HYLB tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for PFFD and 0.15% for HYLB.

HYLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFD and HYLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer