PortfoliosLab logo
CWB vs. ICVT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CWB and ICVT is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

CWB vs. ICVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%110.00%120.00%130.00%140.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
125.86%
114.30%
CWB
ICVT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CWB:

0.97

ICVT:

1.06

Sortino Ratio

CWB:

1.39

ICVT:

1.52

Omega Ratio

CWB:

1.18

ICVT:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

CWB:

0.60

ICVT:

0.43

Martin Ratio

CWB:

3.50

ICVT:

3.75

Ulcer Index

CWB:

3.22%

ICVT:

3.06%

Daily Std Dev

CWB:

11.63%

ICVT:

10.84%

Max Drawdown

CWB:

-32.06%

ICVT:

-37.27%

Current Drawdown

CWB:

-8.89%

ICVT:

-17.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWB achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than ICVT's -0.39% return.


CWB

YTD

-0.45%

1M

-0.65%

6M

1.14%

1Y

11.28%

5Y*

10.23%

10Y*

8.58%

ICVT

YTD

-0.39%

1M

-0.76%

6M

0.97%

1Y

11.44%

5Y*

8.54%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CWB vs. ICVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ICVT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CWB: current value is 0.40%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CWB: 0.40%
Expense ratio chart for ICVT: current value is 0.20%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ICVT: 0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CWB vs. ICVT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CWB is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CWB is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CWB is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CWB is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CWB is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CWB is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ICVT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ICVT is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ICVT is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ICVT is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ICVT is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ICVT is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ICVT is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CWB vs. ICVT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CWB, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
CWB: 0.97
ICVT: 1.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for CWB, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
CWB: 1.39
ICVT: 1.52
The chart of Omega ratio for CWB, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
CWB: 1.18
ICVT: 1.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for CWB, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
CWB: 0.60
ICVT: 0.43
The chart of Martin ratio for CWB, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
CWB: 3.50
ICVT: 3.75

The current CWB Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the ICVT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWB and ICVT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.97
1.06
CWB
ICVT

Dividends

CWB vs. ICVT - Dividend Comparison

CWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than ICVT's 2.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CWB
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF
1.91%1.85%1.97%2.21%1.97%2.34%3.03%6.17%4.25%4.60%7.52%7.37%
ICVT
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
2.27%2.19%1.85%1.93%1.14%1.13%1.86%4.82%2.56%3.06%1.57%0.00%

Drawdowns

CWB vs. ICVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWB drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum ICVT drawdown of -37.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWB and ICVT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.89%
-17.49%
CWB
ICVT

Volatility

CWB vs. ICVT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to iShares Convertible Bond ETF (ICVT) at 6.10%. This indicates that CWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
7.31%
6.10%
CWB
ICVT