PortfoliosLab logo
CWB vs. ANGL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CWB and ANGL is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.5

Performance

CWB vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%200.00%220.00%240.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
230.01%
131.90%
CWB
ANGL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CWB:

0.97

ANGL:

0.98

Sortino Ratio

CWB:

1.39

ANGL:

1.39

Omega Ratio

CWB:

1.18

ANGL:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

CWB:

0.60

ANGL:

1.18

Martin Ratio

CWB:

3.50

ANGL:

5.93

Ulcer Index

CWB:

3.22%

ANGL:

1.09%

Daily Std Dev

CWB:

11.63%

ANGL:

6.60%

Max Drawdown

CWB:

-32.06%

ANGL:

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

CWB:

-8.89%

ANGL:

-1.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWB achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CWB has outperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 8.58%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.71% annualized return.


CWB

YTD

-0.45%

1M

-0.65%

6M

1.14%

1Y

11.28%

5Y*

10.23%

10Y*

8.58%

ANGL

YTD

0.54%

1M

-1.05%

6M

0.99%

1Y

6.75%

5Y*

6.64%

10Y*

5.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CWB vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CWB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CWB: current value is 0.40%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CWB: 0.40%
Expense ratio chart for ANGL: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ANGL: 0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CWB vs. ANGL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CWB is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CWB is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CWB is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CWB is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CWB is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CWB is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ANGL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ANGL is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ANGL is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ANGL is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ANGL is 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ANGL is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ANGL is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CWB vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CWB, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
CWB: 0.97
ANGL: 0.98
The chart of Sortino ratio for CWB, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
CWB: 1.39
ANGL: 1.39
The chart of Omega ratio for CWB, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
CWB: 1.18
ANGL: 1.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for CWB, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
CWB: 0.60
ANGL: 1.18
The chart of Martin ratio for CWB, currently valued at 3.50, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
CWB: 3.50
ANGL: 5.93

The current CWB Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWB and ANGL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.97
0.98
CWB
ANGL

Dividends

CWB vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

CWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than ANGL's 6.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CWB
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF
1.91%1.85%1.97%2.21%1.97%2.34%3.03%6.17%4.25%4.60%7.52%7.37%
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.41%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.79%5.81%6.80%

Drawdowns

CWB vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWB drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum ANGL drawdown of -35.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWB and ANGL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.89%
-1.70%
CWB
ANGL

Volatility

CWB vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) at 5.03%. This indicates that CWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
7.31%
5.03%
CWB
ANGL