CWB vs. PFF
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF).
CWB and PFF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CWB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond. It was launched on Apr 14, 2009. PFF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2007. Both CWB and PFF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CWB or PFF.
Correlation
The correlation between CWB and PFF is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CWB vs. PFF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CWB:
1.42
PFF:
1.11
CWB:
1.95
PFF:
1.55
CWB:
1.25
PFF:
1.20
CWB:
0.63
PFF:
0.77
CWB:
7.76
PFF:
5.35
CWB:
1.57%
PFF:
1.62%
CWB:
8.58%
PFF:
7.83%
CWB:
-32.06%
PFF:
-65.55%
CWB:
-7.69%
PFF:
-4.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CWB achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than PFF's 7.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CWB has outperformed PFF with an annualized return of 9.08%, while PFF has yielded a comparatively lower 3.51% annualized return.
CWB
11.01%
-0.29%
10.90%
11.49%
9.67%
9.08%
PFF
7.86%
-1.92%
3.86%
8.10%
2.18%
3.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CWB vs. PFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CWB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PFF's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CWB vs. PFF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CWB vs. PFF - Dividend Comparison
CWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than PFF's 6.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.48% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% | 7.36% | 3.66% |
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 6.28% | 6.63% | 5.55% | 4.45% | 4.79% | 5.31% | 6.31% | 5.59% | 5.85% | 5.77% | 6.32% | 6.61% |
Drawdowns
CWB vs. PFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CWB drawdown since its inception was -32.06%, smaller than the maximum PFF drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWB and PFF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CWB vs. PFF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) at 2.09%. This indicates that CWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.