PBUS vs. PFM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PBUS (Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Invesco - PBUS tracks the MSCI USA Index while PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PBUS returned 12.30%/yr vs 10.64%/yr for PFM. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PBUS charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.

Performance

PBUS vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PBUS having a 10.03% return and PFM slightly higher at 10.31%.

PBUS

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 8.62%
• YTD: 10.03%
• 1Y: 21.08%
• 3Y*: 19.43%
• 5Y*: 12.30%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.93%

PFM

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: 7.70%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 1Y: 19.09%
• 3Y*: 14.88%
• 5Y*: 10.64%
• 10Y*: 11.60%
• ALL TIME*: 8.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF	$18.29M	$14.70M	$26.21M
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	$817.02K	$841.17K	$978.32K

PBUS vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF	10.03%	17.58%	24.99%	27.33%	-19.64%	26.77%	21.75%	31.60%	-4.77%	7.13%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	10.31%	14.00%	16.87%	11.40%	-6.22%	23.08%	9.53%	26.88%	-4.58%	8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PBUS and PFM is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2017	0.78

The correlation between PBUS and PFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PBUS vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBUS	PFM
Technology	37.9%	23.4%
Financial Services	11.4%	19.0%
Communication Services	9.8%	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	4.0%
Healthcare	9.1%	16.6%
Industrials	9.0%	11.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	11.3%
Energy	3.1%	4.2%
Utilities	2.2%	4.1%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.7%	3.0%

Return for Risk

PBUS vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PBUS

PBUS Risk / Return Rank: 63
PBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
PBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 81
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PBUS vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBUS	PFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.92	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.81	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.35	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.57	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	10.53	-1.61

PBUS vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBUS and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBUS vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBUS drawdown since its inception was -33.15%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBUS and PFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBUS	PFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.15%	-53.21%	+20.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	-7.09%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.07%	-14.50%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.40%	-17.81%	-7.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-1.00%	-0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-6.89%	+1.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.15%	1.73%	+0.42%

Volatility

PBUS vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.60%. This indicates that PBUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBUS	PFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	2.60%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.28%	7.11%	+3.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.07%	9.52%	+3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.16%	13.47%	+3.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.26%	15.18%	+4.08%

PBUS vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBUS has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBUS vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

PBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than PFM's 1.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBUS Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF	1.02%	1.05%	1.20%	1.36%	1.71%	0.98%	1.35%	1.53%	2.33%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.32%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBUS and PFM in my portfolio?

PBUS and PFM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBUS or PFM?

PBUS has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to PFM (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBUS dropped -33.15% vs PFM's -53.21%.

Which ETF is better, PBUS or PFM?

On 5-year performance, PBUS leads with 12.30% vs 10.64% for PFM. On fees, PBUS is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBUS or PFM?

Over the 5-year period, PBUS has performed better with a 12.30% return vs 10.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBUS or PFM?

PBUS is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBUS or PFM?

PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 1.02% for PBUS.

What is the main difference between PBUS and PFM?

PBUS tracks MSCI USA Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for PBUS and 0.53% for PFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.