PAYS vs. EQT
PAYS (PaySign, Inc.) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. PAYS operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, PAYS returned 47.01%/yr vs 4.27%/yr for EQT. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PAYS vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAYS achieves a 73.98% return, which is significantly higher than EQT's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PAYS has outperformed EQT with an annualized return of 47.01%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.27% annualized return.
PAYS
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 114.87%
- YTD
- 73.98%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 68.29%
- 5Y*
- 27.49%
- 10Y*
- 47.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.52%
EQT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 0.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 25.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.26%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $436.52M | $391.65M | $390.40M | |
PAYS PaySign, Inc. | $4.75M | $4.21M | $5.00M |
PAYS vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAYS PaySign, Inc. | 73.98% | 70.53% | 7.86% | 8.53% | 61.25% | -65.52% | -54.29% | 188.35% | 382.19% | 118.56% |
EQT EQT Corporation | -0.02% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAYS and EQT is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2007 | 0.07 |
The correlation between PAYS and EQT shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PAYS:
$500.92M
EQT:
$33.33B
PAYS:
$0.17
EQT:
$4.55
PAYS:
52.94
EQT:
11.71
PAYS:
0.45
EQT:
0.09
PAYS:
6.02
EQT:
3.59
PAYS:
9.94
EQT:
1.32
PAYS:
$91.47M
EQT:
$9.29B
PAYS:
$46.93M
EQT:
$6.78B
PAYS:
$22.09M
EQT:
$6.93B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAYS vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
PAYS
EQT
PAYS vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAYS | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.03 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 0.01 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | 0.02 | +0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAYS vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAYS drawdown since its inception was -98.95%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYS and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAYS | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.95% | -91.51% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.59% | -27.89% | -27.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.60% | -31.62% | -32.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.60% | -42.56% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.09% | -87.56% | -5.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.08% | -21.33% | -28.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.26% | -23.34% | -45.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.72% | 12.69% | +17.03% |
Volatility
PAYS vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) has a higher volatility of 13.28% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 10.22%. This indicates that PAYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAYS | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.28% | 10.22% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.10% | 20.66% | +31.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.23% | 30.59% | +39.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.40% | 42.13% | +25.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.75% | 48.96% | +26.79% |
Dividends
PAYS vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
PAYS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.22% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
PAYS PaySign, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PAYS vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PaySign, Inc. and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PAYS vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
PAYS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.22M and revenue of 28.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.0%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.75B and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.7%.
PAYS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.67M and revenue of 28.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 394.04M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
PAYS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a net income of 5.44M and revenue of 28.04M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 281.45M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAYS and EQT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAYS has higher volatility (13.28%) compared to EQT (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYS dropped -98.95% vs EQT's -91.51%.
PAYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAYS and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer