PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAYS vs. TATT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAYS vs. TATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Tat Techno (TATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYS achieves a 44.47% return, which is significantly higher than TATT's -2.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PAYS has outperformed TATT with an annualized return of 44.31%, while TATT has yielded a comparatively lower 20.82% annualized return.


PAYS

1D
1.36%
1M
10.71%
YTD
44.47%
6M
42.26%
1Y
26.10%
3Y*
44.22%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
44.31%

TATT

1D
-0.62%
1M
17.01%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
60.06%
3Y*
78.16%
5Y*
49.59%
10Y*
20.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAYS vs. TATT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAYS
PaySign, Inc.
44.47%70.53%7.86%8.53%61.25%-65.52%-54.29%188.35%382.19%118.56%
TATT
Tat Techno
-2.88%73.91%153.00%91.51%-16.00%39.28%-10.30%-17.89%-41.43%23.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PAYS and TATT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2007

0.06

The correlation between PAYS and TATT shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAYS:

$454.00M

TATT:

$572.74M

EPS

PAYS:

$0.17

TATT:

$1.29

PE Ratio

PAYS:

43.31

TATT:

33.73

PEG Ratio

PAYS:

0.37

TATT:

0.25

PS Ratio

PAYS:

4.93

TATT:

3.13

PB Ratio

PAYS:

8.25

TATT:

3.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAYS:

$91.47M

TATT:

$177.02M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAYS:

$46.93M

TATT:

$44.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

PAYS:

$22.09M

TATT:

$22.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAYS vs. TATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYS
PAYS Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PAYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAYS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PAYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAYS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

TATT
TATT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYS vs. TATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Tat Techno (TATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAYSTATTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.20

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

1.27

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

3.19

-2.49

PAYS vs. TATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYS Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the TATT Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYS and TATT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAYS vs. TATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYS drawdown since its inception was -98.95%, roughly equal to the maximum TATT drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYS and TATT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAYSTATTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.95%

-97.07%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.85%

-47.50%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.60%

-47.50%

-17.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.60%

-47.50%

-17.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.09%

-75.11%

-17.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.55%

-29.02%

-29.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.36%

-65.99%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.27%

18.90%

+18.37%

Volatility

PAYS vs. TATT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) is 16.38%, while Tat Techno (TATT) has a volatility of 20.17%. This indicates that PAYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAYSTATTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.38%

20.17%

-3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.54%

50.11%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.98%

63.51%

+8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.42%

53.29%

+14.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.98%

49.77%

+26.21%

Dividends

PAYS vs. TATT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAYS nor TATT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PAYS
PaySign, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TATT
Tat Techno
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.24%3.88%

Financials

PAYS vs. TATT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PaySign, Inc. and Tat Techno. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M20222023202420252026
28.04M
41.15M
(PAYS) Total Revenue
(TATT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAYS vs. TATT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PaySign, Inc. and Tat Techno over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
65.0%
24.4%
Portfolio components
PAYS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.22M and revenue of 28.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.0%.

TATT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported a gross profit of 10.03M and revenue of 41.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

PAYS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.67M and revenue of 28.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

TATT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported an operating income of 2.99M and revenue of 41.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

PAYS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a net income of 5.44M and revenue of 28.04M, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.

TATT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported a net income of 3.40M and revenue of 41.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAYS and TATT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TATT has higher volatility (20.17%) compared to PAYS (16.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAYS dropped -98.95% vs TATT's -97.07%.

TATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAYS and TATT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer