PAYS vs. TATT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Tat Techno (TATT).

Performance

PAYS vs. TATT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Tat Techno (TATT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAYS vs. TATT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAYS PaySign, Inc.	14.56%	70.53%	7.86%	8.53%	61.25%	-65.52%	-54.29%	188.35%	382.19%	118.56%
TATT Tat Techno	-9.02%	73.91%	153.00%	91.51%	-16.00%	39.28%	-10.30%	-17.89%	-41.43%	23.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PAYS : $363.58M TATT : $531.98M
EPS PAYS : $0.12 TATT : $1.33
PE Ratio PAYS : 47.21 TATT : 30.46
PEG Ratio PAYS : 0.40 TATT : 0.22
PS Ratio PAYS : 4.35 TATT : 2.88
PB Ratio PAYS : 7.50 TATT : 3.02
Total Revenue (TTM) PAYS : $82.03M TATT : $178.02M
Gross Profit (TTM) PAYS : $48.72M TATT : $44.10M
EBITDA (TTM) PAYS : $16.91M TATT : $23.59M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAYS achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than TATT's -9.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PAYS has outperformed TATT with an annualized return of 41.00%, while TATT has yielded a comparatively lower 19.53% annualized return.

PAYS

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 66.20%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: -6.20%
• 1Y: 178.30%
• 3Y*: 17.58%
• 5Y*: 5.15%
• 10Y*: 41.00%

TATT

• 1D: 6.86%
• 1M: -26.62%
• YTD: -9.02%
• 6M: -7.72%
• 1Y: 47.85%
• 3Y*: 87.44%
• 5Y*: 51.27%
• 10Y*: 19.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PAYS vs. TATT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAYS

PAYS Risk / Return Rank: 88
PAYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PAYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PAYS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PAYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PAYS Martin Ratio Rank: 77

TATT

TATT Risk / Return Rank: 67
TATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
TATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
TATT Omega Ratio Rank: 65
TATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TATT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAYS vs. TATT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) and Tat Techno (TATT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAYS	TATT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	0.77	+1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	1.33	+1.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.18	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	1.17	+1.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.00	3.69	+1.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAYS vs. TATT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the TATT Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAYS and TATT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAYS	TATT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	0.77	+1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	1.00	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.40	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.08	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between PAYS and TATT is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PAYS vs. TATT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAYS nor TATT has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PAYS PaySign, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TATT Tat Techno	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.24%	3.88%

Drawdowns

PAYS vs. TATT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAYS drawdown since its inception was -98.95%, roughly equal to the maximum TATT drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAYS and TATT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAYS	TATT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.95%	-97.07%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.85%	-37.78%	-25.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.98%	-38.93%	-34.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.09%	-75.11%	-17.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.13%	-33.51%	-33.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.45%	-66.21%	-3.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.39%	11.93%	+23.46%

Volatility

PAYS vs. TATT - Volatility Comparison

PaySign, Inc. (PAYS) has a higher volatility of 35.04% compared to Tat Techno (TATT) at 28.89%. This indicates that PAYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TATT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAYS	TATT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.04%	28.89%	+6.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.66%	43.65%	+4.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.96%	62.91%	+14.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.43%	51.45%	+15.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.60%	48.60%	+33.00%

Financials

PAYS vs. TATT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PaySign, Inc. and Tat Techno over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PAYS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.12M and revenue of 22.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

TATT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tat Techno reported a gross profit of 11.72M and revenue of 46.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

PAYS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.85M and revenue of 22.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

TATT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tat Techno reported an operating income of 4.54M and revenue of 46.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.8%.

PAYS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PaySign, Inc. reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 22.76M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

TATT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Tat Techno reported a net income of 4.73M and revenue of 46.53M, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.