ONEQ vs. PFM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite Index while PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ returned 19.68%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for PFM. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEQ charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.

Performance

ONEQ vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than PFM's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed PFM with an annualized return of 19.68%, while PFM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.82% annualized return.

ONEQ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 6M: 15.18%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 27.68%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: 19.68%

PFM

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	16.16%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-3.18%	29.29%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	8.18%	14.00%	16.87%	11.40%	-6.22%	23.08%	9.53%	26.88%	-4.58%	17.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and PFM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2005	0.76

The correlation between ONEQ and PFM shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEQ vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEQ	PFM
Technology	50.8%	24.7%
Communication Services	16.7%	1.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	12.0%
Healthcare	5.1%	14.9%
Financial Services	3.1%	18.5%
Industrials	2.9%	11.1%
Basic Materials	1.0%	3.0%
Utilities	0.9%	4.2%
Real Estate	0.6%	2.0%
Energy	0.6%	4.7%

Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 68
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 62
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEQ	PFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.09	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.07	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.38	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	2.78	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.46	11.28	+1.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEQ vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEQ	PFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.09	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.79	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.78	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.53	+0.13

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, roughly equal to the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and PFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEQ	PFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.09%	-53.21%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	-7.09%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.09%	-14.50%	-9.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.23%	-17.81%	-17.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	-32.22%	-3.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-0.23%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-6.94%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	1.75%	+1.44%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEQ	PFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	2.04%	+2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	7.13%	+4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	9.47%	+6.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.14%	13.54%	+8.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	15.21%	+6.50%

ONEQ vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONEQ vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than PFM's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.67%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.33%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEQ and PFM in my portfolio?

ONEQ and PFM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEQ or PFM?

ONEQ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs PFM's -53.21%.

Which ETF is better, ONEQ or PFM?

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 19.68% vs 11.82% for PFM. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEQ or PFM?

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 19.68% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEQ or PFM?

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEQ or PFM?

PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.67% for ONEQ.

What is the main difference between ONEQ and PFM?

ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.53% for PFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.