ONEQ vs. FDL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ returned 19.68%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for FDL. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEQ charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.

Performance

ONEQ vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 19.68%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.

ONEQ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 6M: 15.18%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 27.68%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: 19.68%

FDL

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.26%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 23.67%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	16.16%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-3.18%	29.29%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	13.33%	14.79%	17.98%	2.94%	6.66%	26.10%	-4.30%	24.41%	-5.99%	12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and FDL is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2006	0.57

The correlation between ONEQ and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEQ vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEQ	FDL
Technology	50.8%	1.1%
Communication Services	16.7%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	14.7%
Healthcare	5.1%	16.8%
Financial Services	3.1%	15.1%
Industrials	2.9%	3.8%
Basic Materials	1.0%	0.3%
Utilities	0.9%	6.5%
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Energy	0.6%	27.3%

Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 68
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 70
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEQ	FDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.11	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.25	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.37	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	5.56	-2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.46	13.56	-1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEQ vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEQ	FDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.11	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.88	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	0.66	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.45	+0.20

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and FDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEQ	FDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.09%	-65.93%	+10.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	-4.27%	-8.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.09%	-12.24%	-11.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.23%	-16.46%	-18.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	-41.40%	+6.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-2.18%	+1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-9.66%	+1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	1.75%	+1.44%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that ONEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEQ	FDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	2.85%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	7.87%	+4.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	11.28%	+4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.14%	14.31%	+7.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	17.11%	+4.60%

ONEQ vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONEQ vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.68%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.67%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEQ and FDL in my portfolio?

ONEQ and FDL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEQ or FDL?

ONEQ has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs FDL's -65.93%.

Which ETF is better, ONEQ or FDL?

On 10-year performance, ONEQ leads with 19.68% vs 11.24% for FDL. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEQ or FDL?

Over the 10-year period, ONEQ has performed better with a 19.68% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEQ or FDL?

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEQ or FDL?

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.67% for ONEQ.

What is the main difference between ONEQ and FDL?

ONEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.45% for FDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.