OMFS vs. SQLV

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

OMFS (Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and SQLV (Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. OMFS is passively managed, while SQLV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OMFS returned 8.31%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for SQLV. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OMFS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SQLV.

Performance

OMFS vs. SQLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a 20.30% return, which is significantly lower than SQLV's 24.77% return.

OMFS

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 2.92%
• 6M: 12.02%
• YTD: 20.30%
• 1Y: 32.18%
• 3Y*: 14.93%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: —

SQLV

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: 7.20%
• 6M: 18.46%
• YTD: 24.77%
• 1Y: 34.38%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMFS vs. SQLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	20.30%	13.34%	3.98%	15.12%	-17.29%	28.60%	15.02%	27.12%	-9.01%	3.83%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	24.77%	2.50%	4.76%	21.21%	-12.86%	37.14%	7.13%	17.41%	-10.55%	5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFS and SQLV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017	0.73

The correlation between OMFS and SQLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OMFS vs. SQLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OMFS	SQLV
Financial Services	25.2%	19.5%
Healthcare	13.1%	18.7%
Technology	11.4%	16.7%
Real Estate	10.7%	0.9%
Industrials	10.3%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	13.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	7.3%
Energy	2.8%	3.9%
Basic Materials	2.1%	3.1%
Communication Services	0.7%	5.0%
Utilities	0.6%	0.6%

Return for Risk

OMFS vs. SQLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFS

OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 75
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SQLV

SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 80
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMFS vs. SQLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OMFS	SQLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.98	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	2.90	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	3.91	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.88	11.86	+0.02

OMFS vs. SQLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFS Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the SQLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFS and SQLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OMFS vs. SQLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum SQLV drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and SQLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMFS	SQLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.50%	-48.34%	+5.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	-8.84%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.35%	-26.86%	+4.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.22%	-26.86%	-2.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	0.00%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.35%	-8.84%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.91%	-0.19%

Volatility

OMFS vs. SQLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is 3.37%, while Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that OMFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OMFS	SQLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	4.28%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.58%	11.77%	+0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.64%	17.42%	+0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.36%	20.94%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.20%	23.27%	+0.93%

OMFS vs. SQLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SQLV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMFS vs. SQLV - Dividend Comparison

OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SQLV's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	1.08%	0.80%	1.87%	1.27%	1.84%	0.66%	1.07%	1.29%	1.50%	0.34%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	0.94%	1.15%	1.11%	1.09%	1.24%	1.12%	1.22%	1.20%	1.08%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMFS and SQLV in my portfolio?

OMFS and SQLV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OMFS or SQLV?

SQLV has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to OMFS (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFS dropped -42.50% vs SQLV's -48.34%.

Which ETF is better, OMFS or SQLV?

On 5-year performance, SQLV leads with 8.92% vs 8.31% for OMFS. On fees, OMFS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, OMFS has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OMFS or SQLV?

Over the 5-year period, SQLV has performed better with a 8.92% return vs 8.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMFS or SQLV?

OMFS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SQLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMFS or SQLV?

OMFS has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.94% for SQLV.

What is the main difference between OMFS and SQLV?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for OMFS and 0.60% for SQLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SQLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.