PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMFS vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OMFS vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.12% return.


OMFS

1D
0.84%
1M
1.85%
YTD
14.58%
6M
15.91%
1Y
30.07%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*

AVUV

1D
0.92%
1M
1.01%
YTD
19.12%
6M
20.66%
1Y
39.89%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
10.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMFS vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
14.58%13.34%3.98%15.12%-17.29%28.60%15.02%8.10%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
19.12%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFS and AVUV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.92

The correlation between OMFS and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

OMFS vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OMFS
AVUV

Financial Services

24.3%
25.8%

Industrials

14.7%
13.9%

Technology

14.2%
7.0%

Healthcare

13.2%
4.2%

Real Estate

12.2%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
18.0%

Energy

4.1%
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

2.8%
4.9%

Utilities

1.1%
0.1%

Communication Services

1.1%
2.8%

Financial Services

OMFS
24.3%
AVUV
25.8%

Industrials

OMFS
14.7%
AVUV
13.9%

Technology

OMFS
14.2%
AVUV
7.0%

Healthcare

OMFS
13.2%
AVUV
4.2%

Real Estate

OMFS
12.2%
AVUV
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

OMFS
8.4%
AVUV
18.0%

Energy

OMFS
4.1%
AVUV
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

OMFS
3.8%
AVUV
4.5%

Basic Materials

OMFS
2.8%
AVUV
4.9%

Utilities

OMFS
1.1%
AVUV
0.1%

Communication Services

OMFS
1.1%
AVUV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMFS vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFS
OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMFS vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMFSAVUVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

2.29

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

3.26

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

4.99

-1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.01

14.84

-3.83

OMFS vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFS and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OMFSAVUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.29

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.48

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.56

-0.15

Drawdowns

OMFS vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMFSAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-49.42%

+6.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-7.95%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.35%

-28.79%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.22%

-28.79%

-0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-0.15%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.49%

-7.96%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.67%

+0.05%

Volatility

OMFS vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.14%. This indicates that OMFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMFSAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

4.14%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

11.28%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

17.50%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.46%

22.73%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.31%

28.30%

-3.99%

OMFS vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

OMFS vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than AVUV's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.28%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
0.91%0.80%1.87%1.27%1.84%0.66%1.07%1.29%1.50%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


OMFS and AVUV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OMFS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to AVUV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFS dropped -42.50% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.93% vs 5.80% for OMFS. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 5.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for OMFS.

AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.91% for OMFS.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for OMFS and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMFS and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer