OMFS vs. AVUV
OMFS (Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. OMFS is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OMFS returned 5.80%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for AVUV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OMFS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
OMFS vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.12% return.
OMFS
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 30.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- —
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 19.12%
- 6M
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 39.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
OMFS vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 14.58% | 13.34% | 3.98% | 15.12% | -17.29% | 28.60% | 15.02% | 8.10% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 19.12% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMFS and AVUV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between OMFS and AVUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
OMFS vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OMFS
AVUV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
OMFS
AVUV
Industrials
OMFS
AVUV
Technology
OMFS
AVUV
Healthcare
OMFS
AVUV
Real Estate
OMFS
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
OMFS
AVUV
Energy
OMFS
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
OMFS
AVUV
Basic Materials
OMFS
AVUV
Utilities
OMFS
AVUV
Communication Services
OMFS
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMFS vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
OMFS
AVUV
OMFS vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMFS | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | 2.29 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 3.26 | -0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 4.99 | -1.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 14.84 | -3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMFS | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 2.29 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.48 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.56 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
OMFS vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMFS | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.50% | -49.42% | +6.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -7.95% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.35% | -28.79% | +6.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.22% | -28.79% | -0.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.16% | -0.15% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.49% | -7.96% | -2.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.67% | +0.05% |
Volatility
OMFS vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.14%. This indicates that OMFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMFS | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 4.14% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.43% | 11.28% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 17.50% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 22.73% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 28.30% | -3.99% |
OMFS vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
OMFS vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than AVUV's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.28% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.87% | 1.27% | 1.84% | 0.66% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.50% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OMFS and AVUV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OMFS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to AVUV (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFS dropped -42.50% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 10.93% vs 5.80% for OMFS. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 5.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for OMFS.
AVUV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.91% for OMFS.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for OMFS and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMFS and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer