SQLV vs. QQQ
SQLV (Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQLV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. SQLV is actively managed, while QQQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SQLV returned 6.41%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SQLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
SQLV vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQLV achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return.
SQLV
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 14.66%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 30.37%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 10.60%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.97%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
SQLV vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | 14.66% | 2.50% | 4.76% | 21.21% | -12.86% | 37.14% | 7.13% | 17.41% | -10.55% | 8.51% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.30% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 10.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQLV and QQQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2017 | 0.47 |
The correlation between SQLV and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SQLV vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SQLV
QQQ
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
SQLV
QQQ
Healthcare
SQLV
QQQ
Technology
SQLV
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
SQLV
QQQ
Industrials
SQLV
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
SQLV
QQQ
Communication Services
SQLV
QQQ
Energy
SQLV
QQQ
Basic Materials
SQLV
QQQ
Real Estate
SQLV
QQQ
Utilities
SQLV
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQLV vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SQLV
QQQ
SQLV vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQLV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.73 | 2.64 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 3.45 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.45 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 3.51 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 13.49 | -3.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQLV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.73 | 2.64 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.81 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.41 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SQLV vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQLV drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQLV and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQLV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.34% | -82.97% | +34.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -11.96% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.86% | -22.77% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | -35.12% | +8.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.26% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -32.79% | +23.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.96% | 3.11% | -0.15% |
Volatility
SQLV vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) is 4.06%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that SQLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQLV | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 4.49% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 12.10% | -0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 15.94% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 22.38% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 22.29% | +1.06% |
SQLV vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQLV vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF | 0.99% | 1.15% | 1.11% | 1.09% | 1.24% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.20% | 1.08% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQLV and QQQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to SQLV (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQLV dropped -48.34% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 17.97% vs 6.41% for SQLV. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SQLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SQLV.
SQLV has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
SQLV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SQLV and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQLV and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer