SQLV vs. XSVM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SQLV (Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQLV is a Quality Factor fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. SQLV is actively managed, while XSVM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SQLV returned 8.18%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for XSVM. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SQLV charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.

Performance

SQLV vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQLV achieves a 23.57% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 25.81% return.

SQLV

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 18.55%
• YTD: 23.57%
• 1Y: 37.64%
• 3Y*: 12.11%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.92%

XSVM

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 2.37%
• 6M: 17.50%
• YTD: 25.81%
• 1Y: 41.62%
• 3Y*: 14.54%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 13.34%
• ALL TIME*: 9.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	$1.18M	$614.27K	$248.07K
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	$2.60M	$2.40M	$2.07M

SQLV vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	23.57%	2.50%	4.76%	21.21%	-12.86%	37.14%	7.13%	17.41%	-10.55%	8.84%
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	25.81%	7.47%	2.30%	20.20%	-13.63%	56.36%	5.08%	30.01%	-12.33%	7.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SQLV and XSVM is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017	0.74

The correlation between SQLV and XSVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.92 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SQLV vs. XSVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SQLV	XSVM
Financial Services	19.0%	45.1%
Healthcare	18.7%	1.7%
Technology	15.9%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.8%	18.1%
Industrials	10.3%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	4.1%
Communication Services	6.0%	2.6%
Energy	4.0%	5.7%
Basic Materials	3.8%	3.0%
Real Estate	0.9%	9.7%
Utilities	0.2%	2.1%

Return for Risk

SQLV vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SQLV

SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 86
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

XSVM

XSVM Risk / Return Rank: 89
XSVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
XSVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
XSVM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
XSVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
XSVM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SQLV vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SQLV	XSVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.21	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	3.22	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.39	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.95	3.91	+0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.39	12.49	-0.10

SQLV vs. XSVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the XSVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQLV and XSVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SQLV vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQLV drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQLV and XSVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SQLV	XSVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-62.57%	+14.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-10.08%	+1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.86%	-26.21%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.86%	-26.21%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-1.45%	-0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-11.48%	+2.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.81%	3.15%	-0.34%

Volatility

SQLV vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison

Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) have volatilities of 4.34% and 4.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SQLV	XSVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	4.18%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.60%	11.73%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.33%	17.89%	-0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.87%	22.33%	-1.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.24%	25.00%	-1.76%

SQLV vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

SQLV vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison

SQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than XSVM's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	0.95%	1.15%	1.11%	1.09%	1.24%	1.12%	1.22%	1.20%	1.08%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.75%	2.29%	1.69%	1.31%	1.79%	1.23%	1.21%	1.22%	2.54%	1.90%	2.29%	2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SQLV and XSVM in my portfolio?

SQLV and XSVM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SQLV or XSVM?

SQLV has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to XSVM (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQLV dropped -48.34% vs XSVM's -62.57%.

Which ETF is better, SQLV or XSVM?

On 5-year performance, XSVM leads with 9.57% vs 8.18% for SQLV. On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, XSVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SQLV or XSVM?

Over the 5-year period, XSVM has performed better with a 9.57% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SQLV or XSVM?

XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SQLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SQLV or XSVM?

XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.95% for SQLV.

What is the main difference between SQLV and XSVM?

SQLV is categorized as Quality Factor, while XSVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SQLV and 0.37% for XSVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XSVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.