Correlation
The correlation between OMFS and DFAS is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
OMFS vs. DFAS
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS).
OMFS and DFAS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OMFS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. DFAS is an actively managed fund by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OMFS or DFAS.
Performance
OMFS vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
OMFS:
0.37
DFAS:
0.08
OMFS:
0.65
DFAS:
0.26
OMFS:
1.08
DFAS:
1.03
OMFS:
0.35
DFAS:
0.05
OMFS:
0.97
DFAS:
0.16
OMFS:
8.12%
DFAS:
9.18%
OMFS:
23.34%
DFAS:
23.66%
OMFS:
-42.50%
DFAS:
-26.13%
OMFS:
-9.52%
DFAS:
-13.46%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly higher than DFAS's -5.64% return.
OMFS
-0.10%
4.80%
-9.23%
7.70%
3.82%
13.30%
N/A
DFAS
-5.64%
5.15%
-12.90%
0.78%
6.19%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OMFS vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAS's 0.34% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OMFS vs. DFAS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
OMFS
DFAS
OMFS vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
OMFS vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison
OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than DFAS's 1.04% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.54% | 1.87% | 1.28% | 1.83% | 0.66% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.50% | 0.34% |
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 1.04% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 3.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
OMFS vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and DFAS.
Loading data...
Volatility
OMFS vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is 5.04%, while Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that OMFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...