PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQLV vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQLV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQLV achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


SQLV

1D
-1.66%
1M
1.74%
YTD
12.76%
6M
12.70%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
12.10%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQLV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
12.76%2.50%4.76%21.21%-12.86%37.14%7.13%17.41%-10.55%8.51%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SQLV and VOO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2017

0.59

The correlation between SQLV and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SQLV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SQLV
VOO

Financial Services

18.7%
11.6%

Healthcare

18.0%
8.5%

Technology

15.4%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.2%
10.2%

Industrials

10.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
4.9%

Communication Services

5.3%
11.3%

Energy

4.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.9%

Utilities

0.3%
2.4%

Financial Services

SQLV
18.7%
VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

SQLV
18.0%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

SQLV
15.4%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SQLV
14.2%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

SQLV
10.3%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

SQLV
8.7%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

SQLV
5.3%
VOO
11.3%

Energy

SQLV
4.4%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

SQLV
4.2%
VOO
1.8%

Real Estate

SQLV
0.6%
VOO
1.9%

Utilities

SQLV
0.3%
VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQLV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQLV
SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQLV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SQLVVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

2.39

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

3.25

-1.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.16

-0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.77

14.73

-5.96

SQLV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQLV and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SQLVVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.39

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.83

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.89

-0.50

Drawdowns

SQLV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQLV drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQLV and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQLVVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.34%

-33.99%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-8.90%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.86%

-18.69%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

-24.52%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.70%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.95%

-3.69%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.91%

+1.05%

Volatility

SQLV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that SQLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQLVVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

2.84%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

8.90%

+2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

11.80%

+5.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.99%

16.81%

+4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.36%

18.01%

+5.35%

SQLV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQLV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

SQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
1.01%1.15%1.11%1.09%1.24%1.12%1.22%1.20%1.08%0.40%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


SQLV and VOO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SQLV has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQLV dropped -48.34% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.90% vs 6.01% for SQLV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.90% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SQLV.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 1.01% for SQLV.

SQLV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SQLV and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQLV and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer