PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SQLV vs. RYSEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SQLV vs. RYSEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Royce Special Equity Fund (RYSEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SQLV achieves a 23.57% return, which is significantly lower than RYSEX's 27.23% return.


SQLV

1D
-0.45%
1M
1.00%
6M
18.55%
YTD
23.57%
1Y
37.64%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.92%

RYSEX

1D
-1.82%
1M
4.02%
6M
18.92%
YTD
27.23%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
9.26%
ALL TIME*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.18M$614.27K$248.07K

SQLV vs. RYSEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
23.57%2.50%4.76%21.21%-12.86%37.14%7.13%17.41%-10.55%8.84%
RYSEX
Royce Special Equity Fund
27.23%3.66%2.93%12.96%-6.60%22.24%7.43%12.73%-9.96%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SQLV and RYSEX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017

0.73

The correlation between SQLV and RYSEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SQLV vs. RYSEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SQLV
SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

RYSEX
RYSEX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RYSEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYSEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYSEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
RYSEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYSEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SQLV vs. RYSEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) and Royce Special Equity Fund (RYSEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SQLVRYSEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.46

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

4.63

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

15.56

-3.17

SQLV vs. RYSEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SQLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the RYSEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SQLV and RYSEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SQLV vs. RYSEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQLV drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than RYSEX's maximum drawdown of -43.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQLV and RYSEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SQLVRYSEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.34%

-43.25%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-8.20%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.86%

-23.03%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

-23.03%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-2.25%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-6.32%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.45%

+0.36%

Volatility

SQLV vs. RYSEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) is 4.34%, while Royce Special Equity Fund (RYSEX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that SQLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYSEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SQLVRYSEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.86%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.60%

9.81%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

14.53%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.87%

16.41%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

17.42%

+5.82%

SQLV vs. RYSEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQLV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RYSEX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SQLV vs. RYSEX - Dividend Comparison

SQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than RYSEX's 9.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYSEX
Royce Special Equity Fund
9.71%12.36%16.35%5.32%12.34%16.53%3.70%11.56%13.11%8.24%7.72%11.68%
SQLV
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
0.95%1.15%1.11%1.09%1.24%1.12%1.22%1.20%1.08%0.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SQLV and RYSEX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYSEX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to SQLV (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQLV dropped -48.34% vs RYSEX's -43.25%.

RYSEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SQLV and RYSEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer