OMFS vs. JSML
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML).
OMFS and JSML are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OMFS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. JSML is a passively managed fund by Janus Henderson that tracks the performance of the Janus Small Cap Growth Alpha Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2016. Both OMFS and JSML are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: OMFS or JSML.
Correlation
The correlation between OMFS and JSML is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
OMFS vs. JSML - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
OMFS:
0.27
JSML:
0.33
OMFS:
0.56
JSML:
0.57
OMFS:
1.07
JSML:
1.07
OMFS:
0.28
JSML:
0.25
OMFS:
0.80
JSML:
0.70
OMFS:
7.88%
JSML:
9.24%
OMFS:
23.18%
JSML:
23.83%
OMFS:
-42.50%
JSML:
-39.64%
OMFS:
-11.74%
JSML:
-13.97%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly higher than JSML's -4.31% return.
OMFS
-2.55%
13.67%
-9.43%
6.11%
14.00%
N/A
JSML
-4.31%
15.63%
-10.49%
7.68%
9.77%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OMFS vs. JSML - Expense Ratio Comparison
OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JSML's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
OMFS vs. JSML — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
OMFS
JSML
OMFS vs. JSML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
OMFS vs. JSML - Dividend Comparison
OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than JSML's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.57% | 1.87% | 1.28% | 1.83% | 0.66% | 1.07% | 1.29% | 1.50% | 0.34% | 0.00% |
JSML Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 1.60% | 1.19% | 0.49% | 0.67% | 0.46% | 0.30% | 0.27% | 0.76% | 0.42% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
OMFS vs. JSML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, which is greater than JSML's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and JSML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
OMFS vs. JSML - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Janus Henderson Small Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSML) have volatilities of 10.19% and 10.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.