PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
OMFS vs. XSHQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


OMFSXSHQ
YTD Return-6.58%1.08%
1Y Return6.73%24.74%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.03%4.72%
5Y Return (Ann)7.67%9.12%
Sharpe Ratio0.361.42
Daily Std Dev20.30%18.57%
Max Drawdown-42.50%-38.33%
Current Drawdown-17.30%-2.40%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between OMFS and XSHQ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

OMFS vs. XSHQ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a -6.58% return, which is significantly lower than XSHQ's 1.08% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


40.00%45.00%50.00%55.00%60.00%65.00%70.00%75.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
57.81%
70.08%
OMFS
XSHQ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF

OMFS vs. XSHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XSHQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Expense ratio chart for OMFS: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%
Expense ratio chart for XSHQ: current value at 0.29% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.29%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OMFS vs. XSHQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OMFS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for OMFS, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.000.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for OMFS, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.000.66
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for OMFS, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for OMFS, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for OMFS, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.000.95
XSHQ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XSHQ, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XSHQ, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.002.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XSHQ, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.501.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XSHQ, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XSHQ, currently valued at 5.94, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.005.94

OMFS vs. XSHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the XSHQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of OMFS and XSHQ.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
0.36
1.42
OMFS
XSHQ

Dividends

OMFS vs. XSHQ - Dividend Comparison

OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than XSHQ's 1.14% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
1.53%1.27%1.84%0.66%1.07%1.29%1.50%0.34%
XSHQ
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
1.14%1.15%2.02%1.25%1.24%1.11%1.16%0.78%

Drawdowns

OMFS vs. XSHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, which is greater than XSHQ's maximum drawdown of -38.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and XSHQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-17.30%
-2.40%
OMFS
XSHQ

Volatility

OMFS vs. XSHQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) at 4.56%. This indicates that OMFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
5.54%
4.56%
OMFS
XSHQ