OMF vs. FCFS
Compare and contrast key facts about OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS).
Performance
OMF vs. FCFS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OMF vs. FCFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | -19.33% | 39.77% | 15.14% | 63.03% | -27.20% | 23.56% | 34.53% | 88.37% | -6.54% | 17.39% |
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 18.23% | 55.68% | -3.20% | 26.45% | 18.03% | 8.47% | -11.74% | 12.72% | 8.48% | 45.56% |
Fundamentals
OMF:
$6.58
FCFS:
$11.02
OMF:
8.13
FCFS:
17.06
OMF:
1.02
FCFS:
1.54
OMF:
$6.24B
FCFS:
$3.66B
OMF:
$4.34B
FCFS:
$2.37B
OMF:
$1.54B
FCFS:
$845.51M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -19.33% return, which is significantly lower than FCFS's 18.23% return. Over the past 10 years, OMF has underperformed FCFS with an annualized return of 15.77%, while FCFS has yielded a comparatively higher 16.91% annualized return.
OMF
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- YTD
- -19.33%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 18.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
FCFS
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 18.23%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- 1Y
- 57.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.94%
- 5Y*
- 24.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMF vs. FCFS — Risk / Return Rank
OMF
FCFS
OMF vs. FCFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMF | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 2.07 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 2.76 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.37 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 4.65 | -4.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | 17.09 | -15.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMF | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 2.07 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.84 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.56 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.33 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between OMF and FCFS is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
OMF vs. FCFS - Dividend Comparison
OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than FCFS's 0.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | 7.81% | 6.17% | 7.90% | 8.13% | 11.41% | 19.08% | 12.33% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 0.87% | 1.00% | 1.41% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.56% | 1.54% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 1.14% | 1.20% |
Drawdowns
OMF vs. FCFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, smaller than the maximum FCFS drawdown of -90.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and FCFS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMF | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.66% | -90.26% | +21.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.68% | -12.75% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | -35.70% | -12.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.66% | -50.16% | -18.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.64% | -4.61% | -19.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.39% | -24.37% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.36% | 3.47% | +6.89% |
Volatility
OMF vs. FCFS - Volatility Comparison
OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) at 8.03%. This indicates that OMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OMF | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | 8.03% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.27% | 19.70% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.94% | 28.14% | +7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.70% | 29.20% | +6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.29% | 30.45% | +15.84% |
Financials
OMF vs. FCFS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and FirstCash, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities