PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMF vs. RDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OMF vs. RDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Radian Group Inc. (RDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly lower than RDN's 10.00% return. Over the past 10 years, OMF has outperformed RDN with an annualized return of 17.54%, while RDN has yielded a comparatively lower 14.34% annualized return.


OMF

1D
-1.29%
1M
5.18%
6M
-0.87%
YTD
-3.82%
1Y
19.25%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
17.54%
ALL TIME*
10.38%

RDN

1D
0.46%
1M
2.77%
6M
20.33%
YTD
10.00%
1Y
22.01%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
15.22%
10Y*
14.34%
ALL TIME*
7.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$64.81M$66.11M$64.74M
$39.21M$49.29M$49.40M

OMF vs. RDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
-3.82%39.77%15.14%63.03%-27.20%23.56%34.53%88.37%-6.54%17.39%
RDN
Radian Group Inc.
10.00%16.90%14.55%55.31%-6.35%6.97%-17.20%53.86%-20.58%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between OMF and RDN is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2015

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between OMF and RDN has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OMF:

$7.23B

RDN:

$5.18B

EPS

OMF:

$6.64

RDN:

$4.22

PE Ratio

OMF:

9.43

RDN:

9.23

PS Ratio

OMF:

1.16

RDN:

4.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

OMF:

$6.36B

RDN:

$1.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OMF:

$3.70B

RDN:

$1.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

OMF:

$1.82B

RDN:

$872.38M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMF vs. RDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OMF
OMF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMF Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
OMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RDN
RDN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
RDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDN Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDN Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OMF vs. RDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Radian Group Inc. (RDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OMFRDNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.19

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

1.62

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.18

3.56

-2.38

OMF vs. RDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMF Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the RDN Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMF and RDN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OMF vs. RDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, smaller than the maximum RDN drawdown of -98.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and RDN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMFRDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.66%

-98.83%

+30.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.68%

-14.34%

-15.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.94%

-16.50%

-13.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.93%

-25.84%

-22.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.66%

-62.80%

-5.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-26.31%

+17.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.15%

-46.89%

+22.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.03%

6.52%

+7.51%

Volatility

OMF vs. RDN - Volatility Comparison

OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to Radian Group Inc. (RDN) at 6.77%. This indicates that OMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMFRDNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

6.77%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.12%

16.99%

+4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.43%

23.97%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.52%

25.65%

+9.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.71%

37.55%

+8.16%

Dividends

OMF vs. RDN - Dividend Comparison

OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than RDN's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
6.70%6.17%7.90%8.13%11.41%19.08%12.33%7.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDN
Radian Group Inc.
2.62%2.83%3.09%3.15%4.20%2.58%2.47%0.04%0.06%0.05%0.06%0.07%

Financials

OMF vs. RDN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and Radian Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

OMF vs. RDN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and Radian Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

OMF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OneMain Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 916.00M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

RDN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Radian Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 288.00M and revenue of 301.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.7%.

OMF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OneMain Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 468.00M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.

RDN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Radian Group Inc. reported an operating income of 201.00M and revenue of 301.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 66.8%.

OMF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, OneMain Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 152.00M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.

RDN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Radian Group Inc. reported a net income of 155.00M and revenue of 301.00M, resulting in a net margin of 51.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OMF and RDN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OMF has higher volatility (7.38%) compared to RDN (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMF dropped -68.66% vs RDN's -98.83%.

RDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMF and RDN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer