NVDA vs. ET
NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, NVDA returned 67.95%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for ET. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVDA vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 19.85% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 67.95%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 13.14% annualized return.
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
ET
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 6M
- 19.34%
- 1Y
- 12.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
NVDA vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 19.85% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDA and ET is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2006 | 0.23 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NVDA and ET has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
NVDA:
$5.00T
ET:
$65.93B
NVDA:
$6.53
ET:
$1.36
NVDA:
31.44
ET:
14.01
NVDA:
19.80
ET:
0.76
NVDA:
25.60
ET:
1.33
NVDA:
$253.49B
ET:
$89.38B
NVDA:
$187.95B
ET:
$20.48B
NVDA:
$192.76B
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDA vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
NVDA
ET
NVDA vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDA | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.22 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 2.70 | +2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDA vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDA | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.72% | -87.81% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -9.38% | -10.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.88% | -24.56% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.34% | -25.82% | -40.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.34% | -72.82% | +6.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -6.47% | -6.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.18% | -25.72% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 4.65% | +3.81% |
Volatility
NVDA vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.08%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDA | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.26% | 5.08% | +8.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.67% | 12.03% | +14.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.00% | 16.13% | +18.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.76% | 24.86% | +26.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 34.99% | +14.85% |
Dividends
NVDA vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than ET's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.00% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
NVDA vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NVDA vs. ET - Profitability Comparison
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDA and ET have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to ET (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs ET's -87.81%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDA and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer