NTSI vs. NDOW
NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) and NDOW (Anydrus Advantage ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NTSI returned 20.27% vs 16.28% for NDOW. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NTSI charges 0.26%/yr vs 2.15%/yr for NDOW.
Performance
NTSI vs. NDOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly higher than NDOW's 6.06% return.
NTSI
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- —
NDOW
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 16.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSI vs. NDOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 6.38% | 30.37% | -2.74% |
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF | 6.06% | 14.80% | -1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSI and NDOW is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024 | 0.81 |
The correlation between NTSI and NDOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSI vs. NDOW — Risk / Return Rank
NTSI
NDOW
NTSI vs. NDOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTSI | NDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 2.28 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 9.05 | -3.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTSI vs. NDOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than NDOW's maximum drawdown of -8.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and NDOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSI | NDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.01% | -8.76% | -25.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -7.17% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -2.68% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -1.41% | -7.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 1.80% | +1.62% |
Volatility
NTSI vs. NDOW - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) at 4.47%. This indicates that NTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NDOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSI | NDOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 4.47% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 8.35% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 9.66% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 9.12% | +6.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 9.12% | +6.57% |
NTSI vs. NDOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than NDOW's 2.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
NTSI vs. NDOW - Dividend Comparison
NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than NDOW's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 3.53% | 3.65% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.66% | 0.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSI and NDOW have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSI has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to NDOW (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs NDOW's -8.76%.
On 1-year performance, NTSI leads with 20.27% vs 16.28% for NDOW. On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, NDOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NTSI has performed better with a 20.27% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 2.15% for NDOW.
NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 1.17% for NDOW.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Anydrus Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 2.15% for NDOW.
NDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSI and NDOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer