PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDOW vs. ENDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDOW vs. ENDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDOW achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than ENDW's 8.64% return.


NDOW

1D
-1.02%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
6.06%
6M
5.31%
1Y
16.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ENDW

1D
-1.20%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
8.64%
6M
7.91%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDOW vs. ENDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NDOW
Anydrus Advantage ETF
6.06%17.29%
ENDW
Cambria Endowment Style ETF
8.64%29.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NDOW and ENDW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025

0.87

The correlation between NDOW and ENDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDOW vs. ENDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDOW
NDOW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
NDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ENDW
ENDW Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ENDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENDW Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ENDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENDW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDOW vs. ENDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDOWENDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

3.91

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

15.60

-6.55

NDOW vs. ENDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the ENDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDOW and ENDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDOW vs. ENDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDOW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, which is greater than ENDW's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDOW and ENDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDOWENDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-6.44%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-6.44%

-0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-2.53%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-0.84%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.61%

+0.19%

Volatility

NDOW vs. ENDW - Volatility Comparison

Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) at 3.75%. This indicates that NDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDOWENDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

3.75%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

8.20%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

10.51%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.12%

11.27%

-2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.12%

11.27%

-2.15%

NDOW vs. ENDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDOW has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ENDW's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDOW vs. ENDW - Dividend Comparison

NDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than ENDW's 2.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ENDW
Cambria Endowment Style ETF
2.23%1.91%0.00%
NDOW
Anydrus Advantage ETF
1.17%1.24%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDOW and ENDW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NDOW has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to ENDW (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDOW dropped -8.76% vs ENDW's -6.44%.

On 1-year performance, ENDW leads with 25.06% vs 16.28% for NDOW. On fees, ENDW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ENDW has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ENDW has performed better with a 25.06% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENDW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 2.15% for NDOW.

ENDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.17% for NDOW.

They also come from different issuers: Anydrus Capital and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 2.15% for NDOW and 0.29% for ENDW.

ENDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDOW and ENDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer