NDOW vs. ENDW
NDOW (Anydrus Advantage ETF) and ENDW (Cambria Endowment Style ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NDOW returned 16.28% vs 25.06% for ENDW. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NDOW charges 2.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for ENDW.
Performance
NDOW vs. ENDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NDOW achieves a 6.06% return, which is significantly lower than ENDW's 8.64% return.
NDOW
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 16.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENDW
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 8.64%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NDOW vs. ENDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF | 6.06% | 17.29% |
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF | 8.64% | 29.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NDOW and ENDW is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between NDOW and ENDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NDOW vs. ENDW — Risk / Return Rank
NDOW
ENDW
NDOW vs. ENDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NDOW | ENDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.91 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 15.60 | -6.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NDOW vs. ENDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NDOW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, which is greater than ENDW's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDOW and ENDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NDOW | ENDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -6.44% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -6.44% | -0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.68% | -2.53% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -0.84% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 1.61% | +0.19% |
Volatility
NDOW vs. ENDW - Volatility Comparison
Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) at 3.75%. This indicates that NDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NDOW | ENDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 3.75% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 8.20% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.66% | 10.51% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.12% | 11.27% | -2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.12% | 11.27% | -2.15% |
NDOW vs. ENDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
NDOW has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ENDW's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
NDOW vs. ENDW - Dividend Comparison
NDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than ENDW's 2.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF | 2.23% | 1.91% | 0.00% |
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF | 1.17% | 1.24% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NDOW and ENDW have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDOW has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to ENDW (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDOW dropped -8.76% vs ENDW's -6.44%.
On 1-year performance, ENDW leads with 25.06% vs 16.28% for NDOW. On fees, ENDW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ENDW has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ENDW has performed better with a 25.06% return vs 16.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENDW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 2.15% for NDOW.
ENDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.17% for NDOW.
They also come from different issuers: Anydrus Capital and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 2.15% for NDOW and 0.29% for ENDW.
ENDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NDOW and ENDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer