PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSI vs. AVDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSI vs. AVDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than AVDE's 11.70% return.


NTSI

1D
-0.40%
1M
1.72%
YTD
8.00%
6M
8.48%
1Y
23.01%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*

AVDE

1D
0.44%
1M
1.17%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.84%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
20.76%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSI vs. AVDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
8.00%30.37%1.11%15.42%-19.27%2.05%
AVDE
Avantis International Equity ETF
11.70%38.05%4.88%17.18%-13.68%2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSI and AVDE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.94

The correlation between NTSI and AVDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSI vs. AVDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSI
NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDE
AVDE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSI vs. AVDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTSIAVDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.65

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

10.35

-3.59

NTSI vs. AVDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the AVDE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSI and AVDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTSI vs. AVDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum AVDE drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and AVDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSIAVDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-36.99%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-11.48%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-13.46%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.01%

-28.73%

-5.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-0.36%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-6.13%

-2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

2.93%

+0.48%

Volatility

NTSI vs. AVDE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE) have volatilities of 4.95% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSIAVDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

4.95%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

12.78%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

15.01%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

16.37%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

18.91%

-3.23%

NTSI vs. AVDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDE's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NTSI vs. AVDE - Dividend Comparison

NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than AVDE's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDE
Avantis International Equity ETF
3.81%2.66%3.29%3.01%2.79%2.46%1.63%0.29%
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
3.48%3.65%2.92%2.35%2.66%0.97%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NTSI and AVDE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVDE has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to NTSI (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs AVDE's -36.99%.

On 5-year performance, AVDE leads with 10.72% vs 6.09% for NTSI. On fees, AVDE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDE has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 6.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NTSI.

AVDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.48% for NTSI.

NTSI is categorized as Global Allocation, while AVDE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 0.23% for AVDE.

AVDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSI and AVDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer