PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSI vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSI vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 6.38% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.15% return.


NTSI

1D
-1.50%
1M
0.19%
YTD
6.38%
6M
6.48%
1Y
20.27%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.20%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSI vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
6.38%30.37%1.11%15.42%-19.27%2.05%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.15%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSI and SPY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.72

The correlation between NTSI and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSI vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSI
NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSI vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NTSISPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.67

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.95

11.92

-5.97

NTSI vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSI and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NTSI vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSISPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-55.19%

+21.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-8.88%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-18.76%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.01%

-24.50%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.10%

-3.17%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-9.04%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

1.98%

+1.44%

Volatility

NTSI vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.87%. This indicates that NTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSISPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

4.87%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

9.85%

+3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

12.50%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

17.15%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

17.95%

-2.26%

NTSI vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NTSI vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
3.53%3.65%2.92%2.35%2.66%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSI and SPY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSI has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to SPY (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.05% vs 5.58% for NTSI. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NTSI.

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.

NTSI is categorized as Global Allocation, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSI and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer