PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSI vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSI vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 15.96% return.


NTSI

1D
0.95%
1M
2.89%
YTD
7.86%
6M
10.24%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*

VEA

1D
0.63%
1M
5.24%
YTD
15.96%
6M
19.86%
1Y
32.71%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSI vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
7.86%30.37%1.11%15.42%-19.27%1.76%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.96%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSI and VEA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.95

The correlation between NTSI and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

NTSI vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NTSI
VEA

Financial Services

25.0%
23.3%

Industrials

17.5%
19.2%

Technology

10.6%
13.8%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
5.6%

Basic Materials

6.7%
7.5%

Energy

4.8%
5.4%

Communication Services

4.7%
3.4%

Utilities

3.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.7%

Financial Services

NTSI
25.0%
VEA
23.3%

Industrials

NTSI
17.5%
VEA
19.2%

Technology

NTSI
10.6%
VEA
13.8%

Healthcare

NTSI
10.5%
VEA
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

NTSI
8.1%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

NTSI
7.4%
VEA
5.6%

Basic Materials

NTSI
6.7%
VEA
7.5%

Energy

NTSI
4.8%
VEA
5.4%

Communication Services

NTSI
4.7%
VEA
3.4%

Utilities

NTSI
3.2%
VEA
3.3%

Real Estate

NTSI
1.5%
VEA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSI vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSI
NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSI vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSIVEADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.10

-0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

2.89

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

2.94

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.41

11.50

-5.09

NTSI vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSI and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSIVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.10

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.61

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.25

+0.14

Drawdowns

NTSI vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSIVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-60.68%

+26.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-11.63%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-13.45%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.01%

-29.71%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

0.00%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-13.29%

+4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.98%

+0.39%

Volatility

NTSI vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) is 5.11%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that NTSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSIVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

5.73%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

13.30%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

15.66%

-0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

16.55%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

17.36%

-1.72%

NTSI vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NTSI vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VEA's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
3.49%3.65%2.92%2.35%2.66%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.59%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, NTSI and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to NTSI (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 10.01% vs 5.89% for NTSI. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, NTSI has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.01% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NTSI.

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.59% for VEA.

NTSI is categorized as Global Allocation, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSI and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer