PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NDOW vs. FARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NDOW vs. FARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDOW achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly lower than FARX's 8.85% return.


NDOW

1D
0.22%
1M
-1.56%
6M
1.76%
YTD
4.81%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.81%

FARX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.45%
6M
5.21%
YTD
8.85%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.77K$28.36K$41.16K
$318.16K$248.70K$289.75K

NDOW vs. FARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NDOW
Anydrus Advantage ETF
4.81%14.80%0.31%
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
8.85%10.61%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between NDOW and FARX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024

0.64

The correlation between NDOW and FARX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NDOW vs. FARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NDOW
NDOW Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
NDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FARX
FARX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NDOW vs. FARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NDOWFARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

6.04

-4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

18.24

-12.11

NDOW vs. FARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the FARX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDOW and FARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NDOW vs. FARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDOW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, which is greater than FARX's maximum drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDOW and FARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NDOWFARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-5.83%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-2.99%

-4.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

-0.99%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-1.08%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

0.99%

+1.06%

Volatility

NDOW vs. FARX - Volatility Comparison

Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF (FARX) at 1.70%. This indicates that NDOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NDOWFARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

1.70%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

5.60%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.72%

7.36%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.03%

6.99%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.03%

6.99%

+2.04%

NDOW vs. FARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDOW has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FARX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NDOW vs. FARX - Dividend Comparison

NDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than FARX's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FARX
Frontier Asset Absolute Return ETF
2.87%3.25%0.19%
NDOW
Anydrus Advantage ETF
1.18%1.24%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


NDOW and FARX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NDOW has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to FARX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDOW dropped -8.76% vs FARX's -5.83%.

On 1-year performance, FARX leads with 18.36% vs 12.87% for NDOW. On fees, FARX is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, FARX has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FARX has performed better with a 18.36% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FARX is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.15% for NDOW.

FARX has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.18% for NDOW.

NDOW is categorized as Global Allocation, while FARX is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Anydrus and Frontier. Their fees differ too: 2.15% for NDOW and 1.00% for FARX.

FARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NDOW and FARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer