NDOW vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NDOW (Anydrus Advantage ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - NDOW is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Anydrus Capital, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. NDOW is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, NDOW returned 17.94% vs 30.19% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. NDOW charges 2.15%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.

Performance

NDOW vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NDOW achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 52.26% return.

NDOW

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 7.04%
• 1Y: 17.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: -21.60%
• YTD: 52.26%
• 6M: 50.77%
• 1Y: 30.19%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: 17.50%
• 10Y*: 11.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NDOW vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	7.15%	14.80%	-1.85%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	52.26%	-5.44%	-3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NDOW and BNO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2024	-0.07

The correlation between NDOW and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NDOW vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NDOW

NDOW Risk / Return Rank: 56
NDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
NDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 59
NDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
NDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 59

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 23
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NDOW vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NDOW	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	0.73	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	1.23	+1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.16	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	1.07	+1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.02	3.33	+6.69

NDOW vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NDOW and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NDOW vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NDOW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NDOW and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NDOW	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-87.06%	+78.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-28.29%	+21.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-28.29%	+26.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-40.10%	+38.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	10.51%	-8.71%

Volatility

NDOW vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) is 4.37%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 10.98%. This indicates that NDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NDOW	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	10.98%	-6.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	37.28%	-28.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.61%	41.73%	-32.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.10%	35.65%	-26.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.10%	36.71%	-27.61%

NDOW vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NDOW has a 2.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

NDOW vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

NDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NDOW Anydrus Advantage ETF	1.16%	1.24%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NDOW and BNO in my portfolio?

NDOW and BNO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NDOW or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to NDOW (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NDOW dropped -8.76% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, NDOW or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 30.19% vs 17.94% for NDOW. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, NDOW has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NDOW or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 30.19% return vs 17.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NDOW or BNO?

BNO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.15% for NDOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NDOW or BNO?

NDOW has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between NDOW and BNO?

NDOW is categorized as Global Allocation, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Anydrus Capital and USCF Investments. Their fees differ too: 2.15% for NDOW and 1.00% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.