PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSI vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSI vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 15.39% return.


NTSI

1D
0.95%
1M
2.89%
YTD
7.86%
6M
10.24%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*

VXUS

1D
0.75%
1M
4.81%
YTD
15.39%
6M
18.56%
1Y
32.67%
3Y*
19.70%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSI vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
7.86%30.37%1.11%15.42%-19.27%1.76%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
15.39%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%-0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSI and VXUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.92

The correlation between NTSI and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

NTSI vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NTSI
VXUS

Financial Services

25.0%
22.3%

Industrials

17.5%
16.1%

Technology

10.6%
18.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
5.0%

Basic Materials

6.7%
7.6%

Energy

4.8%
5.2%

Communication Services

4.7%
4.4%

Utilities

3.2%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.6%

Financial Services

NTSI
25.0%
VXUS
22.3%

Industrials

NTSI
17.5%
VXUS
16.1%

Technology

NTSI
10.6%
VXUS
18.1%

Healthcare

NTSI
10.5%
VXUS
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NTSI
8.1%
VXUS
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

NTSI
7.4%
VXUS
5.0%

Basic Materials

NTSI
6.7%
VXUS
7.6%

Energy

NTSI
4.8%
VXUS
5.2%

Communication Services

NTSI
4.7%
VXUS
4.4%

Utilities

NTSI
3.2%
VXUS
3.2%

Real Estate

NTSI
1.5%
VXUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSI vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSI
NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSI vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSIVXUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.16

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

2.96

-0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.02

-1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.41

11.82

-5.41

NTSI vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSI and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSIVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.16

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.56

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.39

0.00

Drawdowns

NTSI vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSIVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-35.97%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-11.27%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-13.58%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.01%

-29.44%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

0.00%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-8.22%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.88%

+0.49%

Volatility

NTSI vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) is 5.11%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that NTSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSIVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

5.57%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

12.97%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

15.19%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

16.04%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

17.16%

-1.52%

NTSI vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NTSI vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VXUS's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
3.49%3.65%2.92%2.35%2.66%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.63%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NTSI and VXUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VXUS has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to NTSI (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 5-year performance, VXUS leads with 8.88% vs 5.89% for NTSI. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, NTSI has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NTSI.

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.63% for VXUS.

NTSI is categorized as Global Allocation, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 0.05% for VXUS.

VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSI and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer