NTSI vs. NTSX
NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NTSI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, NTSI returned 5.89%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for NTSX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NTSI charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.
Performance
NTSI vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 9.77% return.
NTSI
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.08%
- 10Y*
- —
NTSI vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 7.86% | 30.37% | 1.11% | 15.42% | -19.27% | 1.76% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 9.77% | 18.82% | 20.20% | 22.70% | -25.84% | 14.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTSI and NTSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between NTSI and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
NTSI vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NTSI
NTSX
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
NTSI
NTSX
Industrials
NTSI
NTSX
Technology
NTSI
NTSX
Healthcare
NTSI
NTSX
Consumer Cyclical
NTSI
NTSX
Consumer Defensive
NTSI
NTSX
Basic Materials
NTSI
NTSX
Energy
NTSI
NTSX
Communication Services
NTSI
NTSX
Utilities
NTSI
NTSX
Real Estate
NTSI
NTSX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTSI vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank
NTSI
NTSX
NTSI vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NTSI | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 2.23 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.97 | 3.01 | -1.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.40 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 3.00 | -1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | 13.28 | -6.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NTSI | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 2.23 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.60 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.72 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
NTSI vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and NTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTSI | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.01% | -31.34% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -9.16% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.69% | -16.82% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.01% | -31.34% | -2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | 0.00% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -6.80% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.07% | +1.30% |
Volatility
NTSI vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.23%. This indicates that NTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTSI | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 3.23% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.60% | 9.55% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 12.25% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 17.03% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.64% | 18.27% | -2.63% |
NTSI vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NTSI vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison
NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than NTSX's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 3.49% | 3.65% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.66% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.06% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NTSI and NTSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSI has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to NTSX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs NTSX's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 10.08% vs 5.89% for NTSI. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NTSI.
NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.06% for NTSX.
NTSI is categorized as Global Allocation, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 0.20% for NTSX.
NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTSI and NTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer