PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NTSI vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NTSI vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NTSI achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 9.77% return.


NTSI

1D
0.95%
1M
2.89%
YTD
7.86%
6M
10.24%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
14.50%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*

NTSX

1D
0.10%
1M
4.88%
YTD
9.77%
6M
9.78%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
10.08%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NTSI vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
7.86%30.37%1.11%15.42%-19.27%1.76%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
9.77%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%14.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NTSI and NTSX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.73

The correlation between NTSI and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

NTSI vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NTSI
NTSX

Financial Services

25.0%
12.3%

Industrials

17.5%
7.7%

Technology

10.6%
35.1%

Healthcare

10.5%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
5.5%

Basic Materials

6.7%
1.4%

Energy

4.8%
3.5%

Communication Services

4.7%
12.5%

Utilities

3.2%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.5%

Financial Services

NTSI
25.0%
NTSX
12.3%

Industrials

NTSI
17.5%
NTSX
7.7%

Technology

NTSI
10.6%
NTSX
35.1%

Healthcare

NTSI
10.5%
NTSX
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

NTSI
8.1%
NTSX
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

NTSI
7.4%
NTSX
5.5%

Basic Materials

NTSI
6.7%
NTSX
1.4%

Energy

NTSI
4.8%
NTSX
3.5%

Communication Services

NTSI
4.7%
NTSX
12.5%

Utilities

NTSI
3.2%
NTSX
2.1%

Real Estate

NTSI
1.5%
NTSX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NTSI vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSI
NTSI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NTSI vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NTSINTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.23

-0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

3.01

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.00

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.41

13.28

-6.87

NTSI vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NTSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NTSI and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NTSINTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.23

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.60

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.72

-0.33

Drawdowns

NTSI vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NTSI drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTSI and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NTSINTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-31.34%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-9.16%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-16.82%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.01%

-31.34%

-2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

0.00%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-6.80%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.37%

2.07%

+1.30%

Volatility

NTSI vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.23%. This indicates that NTSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NTSINTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

3.23%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

9.55%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.94%

12.25%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.68%

17.03%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

18.27%

-2.63%

NTSI vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NTSI has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NTSI vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

NTSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than NTSX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NTSI
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
3.49%3.65%2.92%2.35%2.66%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.06%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


NTSI and NTSX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSI has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to NTSX (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTSI dropped -34.01% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 10.08% vs 5.89% for NTSI. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 10.08% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for NTSI.

NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.06% for NTSX.

NTSI is categorized as Global Allocation, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for NTSI and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NTSI and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer