NOBL vs. XUDV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index while XUDV tracks the VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NOBL returned 12.52% vs 30.71% for XUDV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NOBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XUDV.

Performance

NOBL vs. XUDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than XUDV's 20.52% return.

NOBL

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: 8.50%
• 5Y*: 6.18%
• 10Y*: 9.97%

XUDV

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 20.52%
• 6M: 19.58%
• 1Y: 30.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBL vs. XUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	6.48%	5.12%
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF	20.52%	8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBL and XUDV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	0.74

The correlation between NOBL and XUDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

NOBL vs. XUDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NOBL	XUDV
Consumer Defensive	23.6%	15.0%
Industrials	20.2%	12.0%
Financial Services	12.8%	23.5%
Healthcare	10.2%	7.9%
Basic Materials	10.2%	1.3%
Utilities	5.7%	3.7%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	7.7%
Technology	4.6%	13.5%
Real Estate	4.6%	-
Energy	2.9%	6.3%
Communication Services	-	7.0%

Return for Risk

NOBL vs. XUDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 29
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 28
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 27

XUDV

XUDV Risk / Return Rank: 84
XUDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XUDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XUDV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XUDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
XUDV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBL vs. XUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NOBL	XUDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	2.48	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	3.46	-1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.42	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	4.87	-3.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.50	16.36	-12.86

NOBL vs. XUDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the XUDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBL and XUDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NOBL vs. XUDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than XUDV's maximum drawdown of -15.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and XUDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOBL	XUDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-15.98%	-19.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-6.34%	-2.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	-1.80%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-2.06%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	1.88%	+1.70%

Volatility

NOBL vs. XUDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is 3.31%, while Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that NOBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOBL	XUDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	4.47%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.22%	8.82%	-0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	12.47%	-0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	16.31%	-1.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.60%	16.31%	+0.29%

NOBL vs. XUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XUDV's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOBL vs. XUDV - Dividend Comparison

NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than XUDV's 2.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.06%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF	2.58%	3.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOBL and XUDV in my portfolio?

NOBL and XUDV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOBL or XUDV?

XUDV has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBL dropped -35.43% vs XUDV's -15.98%.

Which ETF is better, NOBL or XUDV?

On 1-year performance, XUDV leads with 30.71% vs 12.52% for NOBL. On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOBL or XUDV?

Over the 1-year period, XUDV has performed better with a 30.71% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOBL or XUDV?

XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NOBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOBL or XUDV?

XUDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.06% for NOBL.

What is the main difference between NOBL and XUDV?

NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while XUDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for NOBL and 0.09% for XUDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.