XUDV vs. MULT
XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) and MULT (Franklin Multisector Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUDV is a Dividend fund tracking the VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while MULT is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin. XUDV is passively managed, while MULT is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUDV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MULT.
Performance
XUDV vs. MULT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUDV achieves a 19.02% return, which is significantly higher than MULT's 0.83% return.
XUDV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 19.02%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MULT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUDV vs. MULT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 19.02% | 1.48% |
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF | 0.83% | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUDV and MULT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUDV vs. MULT — Risk / Return Rank
XUDV
MULT
XUDV vs. MULT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Franklin Multisector Income ETF (MULT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUDV | MULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.42 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUDV | MULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
XUDV vs. MULT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, which is greater than MULT's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and MULT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUDV | MULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -1.70% | -14.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -0.48% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -0.31% | -1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | — | — |
Volatility
XUDV vs. MULT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUDV | MULT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 2.95% | +9.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 2.95% | +13.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 2.95% | +13.39% |
XUDV vs. MULT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MULT's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUDV vs. MULT - Dividend Comparison
XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than MULT's 3.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MULT Franklin Multisector Income ETF | 3.41% | 1.56% |
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 3.48% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUDV and MULT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MULT.
XUDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 3.41% for MULT.
XUDV is categorized as Dividend, while MULT is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.39% for MULT.
Find the right allocation for XUDV and MULT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer