NOBL vs. XCLR
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR).
NOBL and XCLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. XCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both NOBL and XCLR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NOBL vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NOBL vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.32% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 6.17% |
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF | -4.88% | 10.25% | 20.67% | 15.64% | -12.93% | 3.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOBL achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than XCLR's -4.88% return.
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -6.79%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 7.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
XCLR
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -4.99%
- YTD
- -4.88%
- 6M
- -3.76%
- 1Y
- 10.37%
- 3Y*
- 12.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NOBL vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NOBL vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank
NOBL
XCLR
NOBL vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOBL | XCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.99 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.43 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.19 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.28 | -0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | 5.24 | -3.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOBL | XCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.99 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.59 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between NOBL and XCLR is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NOBL vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison
NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than XCLR's 13.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF | 13.83% | 13.15% | 18.76% | 1.40% | 1.01% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NOBL vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOBL drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than XCLR's maximum drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBL and XCLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOBL | XCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -14.63% | -20.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -8.29% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -6.45% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.45% | -4.82% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.02% | +1.16% |
Volatility
NOBL vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) have volatilities of 3.55% and 3.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NOBL | XCLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 3.42% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.06% | 7.16% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 10.53% | +4.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 10.58% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 10.58% | +6.01% |