XCLR vs. HEQT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XCLR (Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF) and HEQT (Simplify Hedged Equity ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. XCLR is passively managed, while HEQT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCLR returned 11.99%/yr vs 12.64%/yr for HEQT. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XCLR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for HEQT.

Performance

XCLR vs. HEQT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCLR achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than HEQT's 5.74% return.

XCLR

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -0.23%
• 6M: 0.85%
• YTD: 1.99%
• 1Y: 9.31%
• 3Y*: 11.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.24%

HEQT

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: 4.44%
• YTD: 5.74%
• 1Y: 12.81%
• 3Y*: 12.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF	$1.71M	$2.08M	$1.80M
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	$117.09K	$59.33K	$34.30K

XCLR vs. HEQT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	1.99%	10.25%	20.67%	15.64%	-12.93%	1.90%
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF	5.74%	10.08%	18.30%	16.61%	-8.25%	2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XCLR and HEQT is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2021	0.91

The correlation between XCLR and HEQT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XCLR vs. HEQT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XCLR

XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 36
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

HEQT

HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 77
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XCLR vs. HEQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XCLR	HEQT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	1.74	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	2.46	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.34	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.99	2.37	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	10.53	-6.61

XCLR vs. HEQT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the HEQT Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCLR and HEQT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XCLR vs. HEQT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCLR drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, which is greater than HEQT's maximum drawdown of -11.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLR and HEQT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCLR	HEQT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.63%	-11.51%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-5.09%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.46%	-10.57%	-1.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-0.33%	-0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-2.71%	-1.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.09%	1.15%	+0.94%

Volatility

XCLR vs. HEQT - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) at 2.18%. This indicates that XCLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCLR	HEQT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.57%	2.18%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.01%	5.69%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.61%	6.95%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.35%	8.44%	+1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.35%	8.44%	+1.91%

XCLR vs. HEQT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCLR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HEQT's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCLR vs. HEQT - Dividend Comparison

XCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.88%, more than HEQT's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HEQT Simplify Hedged Equity ETF	1.19%	1.19%	1.29%	4.10%	3.94%	0.27%
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF	12.88%	13.15%	18.76%	1.40%	1.01%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCLR and HEQT in my portfolio?

XCLR and HEQT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XCLR or HEQT?

XCLR has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to HEQT (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCLR dropped -14.63% vs HEQT's -11.51%.

Which ETF is better, XCLR or HEQT?

On 3-year performance, HEQT leads with 12.64% vs 11.99% for XCLR. On fees, XCLR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HEQT has been the lower-risk option at 2.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCLR or HEQT?

Over the 3-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 11.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCLR or HEQT?

XCLR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HEQT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCLR or HEQT?

XCLR has the higher dividend yield at 12.88%, compared with 1.19% for HEQT.

What is the main difference between XCLR and HEQT?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XCLR and 0.43% for HEQT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HEQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.