XCLR vs. MINT
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT).
XCLR and MINT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCLR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 3-Month Collar 95-110 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. MINT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 16, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XCLR or MINT.
Key characteristics
| XCLR | MINT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.63% | 5.18% |
| 1Y Return | 31.98% | 6.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.53% | 3.41% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.34 | 13.53 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.77 | 32.42 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.63 | 9.46 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.76 | 46.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.08 | 506.77 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.51% | 0.01% |
| Daily Std Dev | 9.54% | 0.45% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.74% | -4.62% |
| Current Drawdown | -23.26% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCLR and MINT is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XCLR vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XCLR achieves a 22.63% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 5.18% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCLR vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XCLR vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XCLR vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
XCLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than MINT's 5.32% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCLR Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF | 1.07% | 1.39% | 1.01% | 2.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund | 5.32% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% | 0.80% | 0.88% |
Drawdowns
XCLR vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCLR drawdown since its inception was -46.74%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCLR and MINT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XCLR vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) at 0.10%. This indicates that XCLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.